U++ framework: U++ MT-multithreading and servers » Intentionally inconstistent use of "Atomic" in Mt.h?

Home » U++ Library support » U++ MT-multithreading and servers » Intentionally inconstistent use of "Atomic" in Mt.h?

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Intentionally inconstistent use of "Atomic" in Mt.h? [message #14166 is a reply to message #14165]

Sat, 16 February 2008 17:03

mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

Werner wrote on Sat, 16 February 2008 07:19

All the Atomic... functions in Mt.h (be it WIN32 or POSIX) return int - but shouldn't it be Atomic?

The type of Atomic depends:

MT & POSIX: _Atomic_word -> int
MT & WIN32: LONG -> long
ST & POSIX: int
ST & WIN32: int

Indeed the called WIN32 functions Interlocked... return long. So, to avoid implicit casts it might be preferable to adapt the return type of the Atomic... functions. If I then assign an Atomic to an int, I am seeing what I am doing.

Werner

Well, but you should not directly assign Atomic to int, you should rather use AtomicRead...

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Intentionally inconstistent use of "Atomic" in Mt.h? By: Werner on Sat, 16 February 2008 13:19
		Re: Intentionally inconstistent use of "Atomic" in Mt.h? By: mirek on Sat, 16 February 2008 17:03
		Re: Intentionally inconstistent use of "Atomic" in Mt.h? By: Werner on Sat, 16 February 2008 17:36
		Re: Intentionally inconstistent use of "Atomic" in Mt.h? By: mirek on Wed, 20 February 2008 19:39
		Re: Intentionally inconstistent use of "Atomic" in Mt.h? By: Werner on Wed, 20 February 2008 21:47

Previous Topic:	Distant file info
Next Topic:	Checking socket connection after send.

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Sep 28 16:50:15 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.18061 seconds