Home » U++ Library support » U++ Library : Other (not classified elsewhere) » Ide console
Ide console [message #16033] |
Fri, 23 May 2008 13:32 |
|
For my UltimateGit project I borrowed Console class from TheIDE and I came to the conclusion this class could be separated like CodeEditor. It's very useful. The only problem is it's connected with Web package because of SlaveProcess class which IMO could go somewhere to Core. What do you think?
|
|
|
|
Re: Ide console [message #16037 is a reply to message #16035] |
Fri, 23 May 2008 14:36 |
|
Great I'm not alone.. Mirek tell me what to do with SlaveProcess (and what you think generally about this idea). I think maybe it is worth to get all Execute/Run and connected methods out of console and create Process package. SlaveProcess could be located there too. Then to modify Console package so it was connected with Process package.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Ide console [message #16398 is a reply to message #16396] |
Thu, 12 June 2008 17:52 |
|
luzr wrote on Thu, 12 June 2008 11:38 | Hm, what is wrong with "HardCore"?
In fact, there are some pieces of really hard-core coding in there...
Mirek
|
Hard core means real, true, that one core which in our case is Core..
So IMO Core should still name Core, and "your HardCore" should name CoreUtils, CoreEx, CoreTools or just Utils.
|
|
|
|
Re: Ide console [message #16412 is a reply to message #16398] |
Fri, 13 June 2008 10:16 |
|
mirek
Messages: 13984 Registered: November 2005
|
Ultimate Member |
|
|
unodgs wrote on Thu, 12 June 2008 11:52 |
luzr wrote on Thu, 12 June 2008 11:38 | Hm, what is wrong with "HardCore"?
In fact, there are some pieces of really hard-core coding in there...
Mirek
|
Hard core means real, true, that one core which in our case is Core..
So IMO Core should still name Core, and "your HardCore" should name CoreUtils, CoreEx, CoreTools or just Utils.
|
Well, maybe you misunderstood the issue. HardCore is supposed to be more "Core" than "Core" Memory allocator, String, Stream and other low-level stuff should be there.
Anyway, the main problem is that we have tons of software that is using "Core". We do not want to break it. So we need to keep current Core and have something Core is using.
Mirek
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Ide console [message #16417 is a reply to message #16416] |
Fri, 13 June 2008 12:44 |
|
luzr wrote on Wed, 28 May 2008 21:39 | Well, I was actually thinking (for quite a long time now , that some of Web package should be moved into Core.
That includes Socket and SlaveProcess.
Anyway, Core starts to be too fat. So another idea is to split it to "HardCore" and "Core", which hardcore playing similar role to CtrlCore (that is, most of system dependent stuff and basic *hard* things like memory allocator or String). In Core then would be things like Value, XML etc...
I think Console package is definitely a good idea.
Mirek
|
Maybe "Common" or "System", because will be base methods wich links from any package?
[Updated on: Mon, 23 June 2008 14:49] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Jun 08 08:52:30 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01953 seconds
|