U++ framework
Do not panic. Ask here before giving up.

Home » Community » Coffee corner » My explaination of why Ultimate++ is not mainstream
Re: My explaination of why Ultimate++ is not mainstream [message #17441 is a reply to message #17435] Fri, 15 August 2008 11:27 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
cbpporter wrote on Thu, 14 August 2008 16:20

luzr wrote on Thu, 14 August 2008 23:10

cbpporter wrote on Thu, 14 August 2008 15:37


AFAIK U++ uses static linking.



Unfortunately, not in Linux. Libraries we need are not generally available as static. Plus, of course, THAT licensing issue...

Mirek

I meant only for U++ packages. As in if I use Core, I will get static linking to Core. This makes LGPLing Core impossible, because it only applies to dynamic linking.


Yes, I guess it is a good point... Smile

Mirek
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Ultimate++ Website Logo Text
Next Topic: MPL
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Oct 04 20:58:57 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00855 seconds