U++ framework
Do not panic. Ask here before giving up.

Home » Community » Coffee corner » My explaination of why Ultimate++ is not mainstream
Re: My explaination of why Ultimate++ is not mainstream [message #17455 is a reply to message #17425] Fri, 15 August 2008 19:46 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
amrein is currently offline  amrein
Messages: 278
Registered: August 2008
Location: France
Experienced Member
MIT is "The Massachusetts Institute of Technology". They has mainly students in science, technology but also other areas of scholarship. Very good reputation in US. Smile

The MIT licence is very easy to understand and complete. At least, this one will do what you want. Your old licence doesn't protect your copyright enforcement in a few situations (as soon as someone modify U++ source code).

Just add:

MIT licence is a very permissive licence. It's proprietary software friendly. It's also OSI approved (Open Source Initiative) and compatible with GNU GPL/LGPL licences too.


Only thing: there are no much software using it. Less than the BSD licence. When I begun this thread, I was thinking about releasing GPL software over U++. Then, I thought about merging things from GTK+/Glib too to have theming in-build in U++ (they use LGPL).

[Updated on: Fri, 15 August 2008 19:58]

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Ultimate++ Website Logo Text
Next Topic: MPL
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Oct 04 18:01:10 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01007 seconds