U++ framework: LineEdit, EditFields, DocEdit

Home » U++ Library support » LineEdit, EditFields, DocEdit » String to double

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

String to double [message #23985]

Mon, 14 December 2009 11:28

exdatis
Messages: 7
Registered: December 2009
Location: Vojvodina

Promising Member

Sorry, but...
How,
edit.GetText() to double
Thanks! Embarassed

Report message to a moderator

Re: String to double [message #23986 is a reply to message #23985]

Mon, 14 December 2009 12:01

koldo
Messages: 3461
Registered: August 2008

Senior Veteran

Hello exdatis

It is not difficult. You can use:

atof(edit.GetData().ToString());

Best regards
Koldo

Best regards
Iñaki

Report message to a moderator

Re: String to double [message #23987 is a reply to message #23986]

Mon, 14 December 2009 12:07

cbpporter
Messages: 1428
Registered: September 2007

Ultimate Contributor

double StrDbl(const char* s)

is the U++ way.

[Updated on: Mon, 14 December 2009 12:07]

Report message to a moderator

Re: String to double [message #23988 is a reply to message #23986]

Mon, 14 December 2009 12:08

exdatis
Messages: 7
Registered: December 2009
Location: Vojvodina

Promising Member

Thanks,
easy!
p.s. StrDbl(const char* s) it's work Confused

Report message to a moderator

Re: String to double [message #23989 is a reply to message #23988]

Mon, 14 December 2009 13:51

mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

exdatis wrote on Mon, 14 December 2009 06:08

Thanks,
easy!
p.s. StrDbl(const char* s) it's work Confused

Be aware that if s does not represent double (e.g. is empty), StrDbl returns Null (which is represented by very high negative number and can be tested for using IsNull).

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Incorrect position of chars in DocEdit ctrl.
Next Topic:	Get enter key in EditString

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Aug 31 04:56:19 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00643 seconds