U++ framework: U++ Developers corner » Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. [message #31626 is a reply to message #31619]

Fri, 18 March 2011 11:01

kohait00
Messages: 939
Registered: July 2009
Location: Germany

Experienced Contributor

the flag handling should be better IMHO.

flag = 2 is quite bad, leaving things untouched...
it should determine itself, when the control is owned by someone else, to take over the responsibility

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 17:18
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: kohait00 on Wed, 16 March 2011 17:26
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 17:29
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 17:30
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 17:39
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: kohait00 on Wed, 16 March 2011 18:01
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 18:10
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 18:29
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 18:35
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 18:43
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 19:24
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 02:13
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: kohait00 on Fri, 18 March 2011 11:01
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 14:39
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 15:21
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 15:40
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 16:22
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 16:34
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: mirek on Fri, 18 March 2011 19:35
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: mirek on Fri, 18 March 2011 19:32
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 23:02
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: mirek on Fri, 18 March 2011 23:18
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 23:34
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: mirek on Fri, 18 March 2011 23:40
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Sat, 19 March 2011 00:02
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: mirek on Sat, 19 March 2011 00:37
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Sat, 19 March 2011 01:30
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Sat, 19 March 2011 01:35
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: mirek on Sat, 19 March 2011 10:59
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: kohait00 on Sun, 20 March 2011 10:32
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Sun, 20 March 2011 14:07
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Sun, 20 March 2011 14:11
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Sun, 20 March 2011 14:28
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: kohait00 on Fri, 25 March 2011 13:26
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Sun, 27 March 2011 15:33
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: kohait00 on Sun, 17 April 2011 17:25
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Tue, 19 April 2011 06:00
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: kohait00 on Tue, 19 April 2011 09:14
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Tue, 19 April 2011 14:09
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: kohait00 on Tue, 19 April 2011 18:05
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 20 April 2011 02:44
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: kohait00 on Wed, 20 April 2011 08:51
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 20 April 2011 19:24
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 20 April 2011 21:17
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 20 April 2011 21:23
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 20 April 2011 21:38
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: kohait00 on Thu, 28 April 2011 16:32
		revised ownership change By: kohait00 on Thu, 28 April 2011 18:28
		Re: revised ownership change By: Lance on Thu, 28 April 2011 21:45
		Re: revised ownership change By: kohait00 on Thu, 28 April 2011 21:57
		Re: revised ownership change By: Lance on Thu, 28 April 2011 23:18
		Re: revised ownership change By: Lance on Thu, 28 April 2011 23:31
		Re: revised ownership change By: Lance on Thu, 28 April 2011 23:54
		Re: revised ownership change By: kohait00 on Sun, 22 May 2011 21:58
		Re: revised ownership change By: Mindtraveller on Mon, 23 May 2011 00:28
		Re: revised ownership change By: kohait00 on Mon, 23 May 2011 11:16
		Re: revised ownership change By: Lance on Mon, 06 June 2011 05:11
		Re: revised ownership change By: Lance on Mon, 06 June 2011 05:05

Previous Topic:	Get MAC addresses for windows and linux
Next Topic:	Testing framework in U++.

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Jul 26 21:09:48 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01152 seconds