U++ framework: U++ Core » CoWork and shared memory

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » CoWork and shared memory

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: CoWork and shared memory [message #35530 is a reply to message #35528]

Sun, 26 February 2012 09:56

mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

peek wrote on Sat, 25 February 2012 14:05

Hello Mirek

So this way have Cowork processes to end fast because they work in any way in the same thread that main program?

I mean, to do:

App::~App() {
	finish = true;
	...

// and in Cowork function
if (finish)
	return;

is useless as destructor is not accessible until Cowork variable is destructed and that is is done when all Cowork calls have ended.

No, this still works - CoWork has no clue what the processing is and this one simply makes the processing "nop" and it ends quickly. The loop would still go through all iterations, thread will still preform them, but each iteration job will end immediately...

Quote:

A question: If the Cowork jobs lasts time a solution could be to run Cowork in a separate thread?

Well, not really, if you want a clean exit from the app...

The problematic thing is that for clean exit, you need cannot use any form on thread abortion - it has to exit through its normal exit point; otherwise it would result in resource leaks.

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		CoWork and shared memory By: peek on Wed, 22 February 2012 17:53
		Re: CoWork and shared memory By: mirek on Thu, 23 February 2012 20:38
		Re: CoWork and shared memory By: peek on Thu, 23 February 2012 21:41
		Re: CoWork and shared memory By: mirek on Fri, 24 February 2012 11:53
		Re: CoWork and shared memory By: mirek on Fri, 24 February 2012 11:56
		Re: CoWork and shared memory By: peek on Fri, 24 February 2012 13:04
		Re: CoWork and shared memory By: mirek on Fri, 24 February 2012 13:52
		Re: CoWork and shared memory By: peek on Sat, 25 February 2012 20:05
		Re: CoWork and shared memory By: mirek on Sun, 26 February 2012 09:56

Previous Topic:	Point implicit conversions
Next Topic:	put32 for double precision values..

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Sep 16 14:56:19 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00825 seconds