Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Community » PR, media coverage, articles and documentation » u++ rules
Re: u++ rules [message #1824 is a reply to message #1823] Tue, 21 March 2006 18:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 13984
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
lindquist wrote on Tue, 21 March 2006 11:29


The only thing I dont like is the naming. I'm personally very careful not to litter the global namespace when writing libraries and place everything inside namespaces. I would really have like CtrlLib to fit inside a Ctrl namespace:



Well, we are not ignorant of namespaces. We have considered them each single year of U++ development - in early years, namespaces were not used because of compilers unable to deal with some template constructs with namespaces. Later we hesitated to introduce them because of little gains and too much trouble.

Anyway, I am afraid that this starts to be more serious problem now, so I think you can expect "upp::" namespace to happen sooner or later (perhaps Q2 or Q3 / 2006) - of course, as long as no serious problem blocks that...

Mirek
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: JX reviews U++ ;)
Next Topic: It is needed to write a press release about the release of upp-602
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Jun 07 02:46:04 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01238 seconds