U++ framework: U++ Callbacks and Timers » Virtual functions versus callbacks

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Callbacks and Timers » Virtual functions versus callbacks

Wed, 06 January 2010 22:11

mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

mrjt wrote on Wed, 06 January 2010 05:29

IMO obviously, only Mirek could give a definitive answer.

I would say that

- virtual methods are fine for representing input interface
- callbacks are good for representing output interface

		Virtual functions versus callbacks By: koldo on Tue, 05 January 2010 09:59
		Re: Virtual functions versus callbacks By: unodgs on Tue, 05 January 2010 10:36
		Re: Virtual functions versus callbacks By: mirek on Wed, 06 January 2010 22:09
		Re: Virtual functions versus callbacks By: mrjt on Tue, 05 January 2010 17:55
		Re: Virtual functions versus callbacks By: koldo on Wed, 06 January 2010 09:51
		Re: Virtual functions versus callbacks By: mrjt on Wed, 06 January 2010 11:29
		Re: Virtual functions versus callbacks By: koldo on Wed, 06 January 2010 11:45
		Re: Virtual functions versus callbacks By: mirek on Wed, 06 January 2010 22:11

Previous Topic:	mini BUGFIX in CallbackArgTarget
Next Topic:	extracted Timer from Ctrl

Goto Forum:

] [

]

Current Time: Sat May 30 06:34:31 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00513 seconds