U++ framework: U++ Developers corner » Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) [message #29799 is a reply to message #27209]

Thu, 18 November 2010 09:15

kohait00
Messages: 939
Registered: July 2009
Location: Germany

Experienced Contributor

i've seen koldo porting SDL to be a SDLCtrl.
but it seems not to be a 'true' sdl port, heavy relying on windows draw surface handles etc..

what was the intention for that?

btw:
Functions4U_Gui.h:7
needs to read like this to compile it successfully for GCC:
(making Image ref a const one)

inline const RGBA *GetPixel(const Image &img, int x, int y) {

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: kohait00 on Fri, 02 July 2010 10:19
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: Mindtraveller on Fri, 02 July 2010 16:24
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: kohait00 on Fri, 02 July 2010 16:53
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: kohait00 on Thu, 18 November 2010 09:15
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: koldo on Thu, 18 November 2010 11:13
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: kohait00 on Thu, 18 November 2010 11:19
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: koldo on Thu, 18 November 2010 11:23
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Sat, 27 November 2010 18:21
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: dolik.rce on Sat, 27 November 2010 19:00
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Sat, 27 November 2010 19:51
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: koldo on Sun, 28 November 2010 09:51
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Sun, 28 November 2010 12:21
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: unodgs on Sun, 28 November 2010 12:27
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Sun, 28 November 2010 12:51
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: Tom1 on Mon, 29 November 2010 10:11
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: zsolt on Fri, 17 December 2010 12:16
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Sat, 18 December 2010 09:37
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: kohait00 on Tue, 05 July 2011 16:28
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: chickenk on Tue, 05 July 2011 18:14
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: kohait00 on Tue, 05 July 2011 19:20
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mr_ped on Mon, 29 November 2010 10:32
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Mon, 29 November 2010 10:50
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: Tom1 on Mon, 29 November 2010 12:56
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Mon, 29 November 2010 19:08

Previous Topic:	U++ video control to come soon
Next Topic:	Rainbow Framebuffer - theide running

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Jul 29 06:06:24 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00691 seconds