Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
| Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) [message #30235 is a reply to message #29900] |
Fri, 17 December 2010 12:16   |
zsolt
Messages: 704
Registered: December 2005
Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
Contributor |
|
|
| mirek wrote on Sun, 28 November 2010 12:51 |
| unodgs wrote on Sun, 28 November 2010 06:27 |
That's a really really great news. Can't wait to try it in action. That would save me a lot of time. I could simply avoid creating web version of my app. Gtk guys use canvas and javascript - seems to be a good choice.
|
Unfortunately, javascript appears to be to weak for RDP-like stream...
We would need at least Java to get what we want.
Plus, perhaps this technology will help in similar cases where Terminal services is usable, but would have big problem when your web latency is too high (just like with TS).
|
What about HTML5 Canvas and the full duplex WebSocket API in HTML5 Javascript?
See ThinVNC as an example.
[Updated on: Fri, 17 December 2010 12:23] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
 |
|
Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
|
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
|
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
|
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
By: kohait00 on Thu, 18 November 2010 09:15 |
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
By: koldo on Thu, 18 November 2010 11:13 |
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
By: kohait00 on Thu, 18 November 2010 11:19 |
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
By: koldo on Thu, 18 November 2010 11:23 |
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
By: mirek on Sat, 27 November 2010 18:21 |
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
|
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
By: mirek on Sat, 27 November 2010 19:51 |
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
By: koldo on Sun, 28 November 2010 09:51 |
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
By: mirek on Sun, 28 November 2010 12:21 |
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
By: unodgs on Sun, 28 November 2010 12:27 |
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
By: mirek on Sun, 28 November 2010 12:51 |
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
By: Tom1 on Mon, 29 November 2010 10:11 |
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
By: zsolt on Fri, 17 December 2010 12:16 |
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
By: mirek on Sat, 18 December 2010 09:37 |
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
|
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
|
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
|
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
By: mr_ped on Mon, 29 November 2010 10:32 |
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
By: mirek on Mon, 29 November 2010 10:50 |
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
By: Tom1 on Mon, 29 November 2010 12:56 |
|
|
Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)
By: mirek on Mon, 29 November 2010 19:08 |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Jul 29 06:06:10 GMT+2 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00991 seconds
|
U++ framework
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
