Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined.
Re: Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined [message #31810 is a reply to message #16471] Tue, 29 March 2011 13:10 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
kohait00 is currently offline  kohait00
Messages: 939
Registered: July 2009
Location: Germany
Experienced Contributor
this is still an issue though..

using MSC optimal, which may not use BLITZ, we end up with broken INITBLOCKs..because no index. compiling MSC9 with BLITZ my app works, with optimal and thus without BLITZ the app doesnt.

any idea how to make this work?

BTW: at which point the init files are used? in the ide oder somewhere in the code?

EDIT: in another thread i found that init files are only used with BLITZ, is that right? so thats why no BLITZ_INDEX__ to meangle the static names

but i still wonder, why it doesnt work, if the problem described in the thread only arised with blitz..and i am needing blitz to make it work..sth is weired here

[Updated on: Tue, 29 March 2011 14:06]

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers
Next Topic: ADDs: ValueMap
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Jun 11 20:39:26 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01807 seconds