U++ framework: U++ Core » random functions proposal

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » random functions proposal

Tue, 17 January 2012 14:24

mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

...but it looks like int64 -> double conversion is CPU opcode, so perhaps Random64(int n) as prerequisite, than Randomf() is a good path...

		random functions proposal By: ratah on Mon, 16 January 2012 17:06
		Re: random functions proposal By: dolik.rce on Mon, 16 January 2012 17:58
		Re: random functions proposal By: Sender Ghost on Mon, 16 January 2012 18:31
		Re: random functions proposal By: ratah on Tue, 17 January 2012 09:56
		Re: random functions proposal By: mirek on Tue, 17 January 2012 11:13
		Re: random functions proposal By: Sender Ghost on Tue, 17 January 2012 12:58
		Re: random functions proposal By: koldo on Tue, 17 January 2012 13:10
		Re: random functions proposal By: mirek on Tue, 17 January 2012 13:59
		Re: random functions proposal By: mirek on Tue, 17 January 2012 14:24
		Re: random functions proposal By: dolik.rce on Tue, 17 January 2012 18:45
		Re: random functions proposal By: Sender Ghost on Tue, 17 January 2012 20:08
		Re: random functions proposal By: dolik.rce on Tue, 17 January 2012 20:25
		Re: random functions proposal By: Sender Ghost on Tue, 17 January 2012 20:37
		Re: random functions proposal By: cbpporter on Wed, 18 January 2012 15:44
		Re: random functions proposal By: dolik.rce on Wed, 18 January 2012 17:45
		Re: random functions proposal By: mirek on Wed, 18 January 2012 19:24

Previous Topic:	Init a ctrl inside INITBLOCK
Next Topic:	problem with new and delete

Goto Forum:

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Sep 29 16:28:22 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.43190 seconds