U++ framework: U++ Core » CoWork and shared memory

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » CoWork and shared memory

Fri, 24 February 2012 11:53

mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

peek wrote on Thu, 23 February 2012 15:41

Thank you Mirek

I will try with some INITBLOCK.

The reason of the question was that in the doc it says:

Quote:

This class is indented as loop-parallelization tool. Whenever loop iterations are independent (they do not share any data)

Thank you again Smile

Ah, sorry, I guess it would need more clarification. The real deal is that 'not share any data' is best wrt performance.

		CoWork and shared memory By: peek on Wed, 22 February 2012 17:53
		Re: CoWork and shared memory By: mirek on Thu, 23 February 2012 20:38
		Re: CoWork and shared memory By: peek on Thu, 23 February 2012 21:41
		Re: CoWork and shared memory By: mirek on Fri, 24 February 2012 11:53
		Re: CoWork and shared memory By: mirek on Fri, 24 February 2012 11:56
		Re: CoWork and shared memory By: peek on Fri, 24 February 2012 13:04
		Re: CoWork and shared memory By: mirek on Fri, 24 February 2012 13:52
		Re: CoWork and shared memory By: peek on Sat, 25 February 2012 20:05
		Re: CoWork and shared memory By: mirek on Sun, 26 February 2012 09:56

Previous Topic:	Point implicit conversions
Next Topic:	put32 for double precision values..

Goto Forum:

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Sep 16 02:41:36 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00713 seconds