Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » why no virtual destructor for RegExp?
Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? [message #38890 is a reply to message #38889] Fri, 25 January 2013 16:10 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
dolik.rce is currently offline  dolik.rce
Messages: 1789
Registered: August 2008
Location: Czech Republic
Ultimate Contributor

PS: I forgot... About the returning, I think it is okay to modify the referenced string. If necessary it should be simple to add a another method with separate string for output, that would not modify the input.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Details when compiling in 64 bits
Next Topic: Wanted: OpenGL for gtk+ backend
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu May 23 12:21:32 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02184 seconds