U++ framework: External resources » Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...)

Home » Developing U++ » External resources » Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...)

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...) [message #436 is a reply to message #432]

Sun, 01 January 2006 13:17

gprentice
Messages: 260
Registered: November 2005
Location: New Zealand

Experienced Member

BTW - that CLOS article appears to be ten years old !!
That company's website is all about LISP now - which also has the "incremental development" capability.

I don't think dynamic languages have taken over from C++ at all since that article was written. Smile

Graeme

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...) By: fudadmin on Sun, 01 January 2006 03:44
		Re: Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...) By: mirek on Sun, 01 January 2006 08:27
		Re: Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...) By: gprentice on Sun, 01 January 2006 13:04
		Re: Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...) By: mirek on Sun, 01 January 2006 14:34
		Re: Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...) By: gprentice on Sun, 01 January 2006 13:17

Previous Topic:	dynamically updating programs....
Next Topic:	opinions about FOX-TOOLKIT

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Sep 14 02:03:47 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00760 seconds