U++ framework: External resources » Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...)

Home » Developing U++ » External resources » Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...)

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...) [message #437 is a reply to message #435]

Sun, 01 January 2006 14:34

mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

gprentice wrote on Sun, 01 January 2006 07:04

Well I think he's correct when he says this.

Quote:

But C++ is hard to use, and requires an inordinate investment in time to avoid memory leaks (that result in poor performance and random crashes) and to tackle exception handling problems.

though it seems use of Garbage collection is becoming more common in C++ and people use new/delete much less than they used to, even without GC. There's still a large amount of discussion goes on in C++ newsgroups about exception safety.

Actually, both problems are very aggressively addressed in U++.

Resource management is resolved by following "everything belongs to some scope" principle. Together with U++ containers, there are no more resource management problems.

Exception handling problem is pragmatically resolved by ignoring out-of-memory exceptions;) If you go out-of-memory, app simply stops and that is all. I believe that most applications that put effort into solving this are unable to deal with out-of-memory anyway, as there is no reasonable way how to debug such condition. Plus, any application with recursion is prone to similar "out of stack" problem that cannot be solved using exceptions.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...) By: fudadmin on Sun, 01 January 2006 03:44
		Re: Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...) By: mirek on Sun, 01 January 2006 08:27
		Re: Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...) By: gprentice on Sun, 01 January 2006 13:04
		Re: Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...) By: mirek on Sun, 01 January 2006 14:34
		Re: Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...) By: gprentice on Sun, 01 January 2006 13:17

Previous Topic:	dynamically updating programs....
Next Topic:	opinions about FOX-TOOLKIT

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Sep 24 02:39:37 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00617 seconds