Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Considering different approach to Win32 release
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release [message #45305 is a reply to message #45303] Thu, 29 October 2015 13:43 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
cbpporter is currently offline  cbpporter
Messages: 1401
Registered: September 2007
Ultimate Contributor
mirek wrote on Thu, 29 October 2015 14:13
cbpporter wrote on Thu, 29 October 2015 09:30
mirek wrote on Wed, 28 October 2015 20:20
use

class Source : Moveable<Source>


That said, sometimes I am thinking that perhaps that "Moveable" thing is unnecessary... (It only serves to remind the programmer that there are rules about things put into Vector).

Thanks! So NTL_MOVEABLE no longer works under this setup?

It is weird tracking things down with all the difference s between compilers and version.

I have one final issue which I know how to solve:

def.Blocks.Pop();


Now, first of all, I shouldn't be using Pop, since I do not care about the value. I should be using Drop.

class Block: Moveable<Block> {
public:
	VectorMap<String, Variable> Vars;
	int Temps;
};


I get the error "use of deleted Block::Bock(const block&)" / "is implicitly deleted because the default definition would be ill-formatted".


This another small difference. See http://www.ultimatepp.org/srcdoc$Core$pick_$en-us.html, Composition.

You need to add

rval_default(Block);

to the class.


Thank you!

I also needed to add a default constructor, but it works now.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message icon14.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: mingw/gdb troubles
Next Topic: Ideas on U++ as library
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu May 23 14:33:31 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02556 seconds