|
|
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Considering different approach to Win32 release
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release [message #45305 is a reply to message #45303] |
Thu, 29 October 2015 13:43 |
cbpporter
Messages: 1401 Registered: September 2007
|
Ultimate Contributor |
|
|
mirek wrote on Thu, 29 October 2015 14:13cbpporter wrote on Thu, 29 October 2015 09:30mirek wrote on Wed, 28 October 2015 20:20use
class Source : Moveable<Source>
That said, sometimes I am thinking that perhaps that "Moveable" thing is unnecessary... (It only serves to remind the programmer that there are rules about things put into Vector).
Thanks! So NTL_MOVEABLE no longer works under this setup?
It is weird tracking things down with all the difference s between compilers and version.
I have one final issue which I know how to solve:
Now, first of all, I shouldn't be using Pop, since I do not care about the value. I should be using Drop.
class Block: Moveable<Block> {
public:
VectorMap<String, Variable> Vars;
int Temps;
};
I get the error "use of deleted Block::Bock(const block&)" / "is implicitly deleted because the default definition would be ill-formatted".
This another small difference. See http://www.ultimatepp.org/srcdoc$Core$pick_$en-us.html, Composition.
You need to add
rval_default(Block);
to the class.
Thank you!
I also needed to add a default constructor, but it works now.
|
|
|
|
|
Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Sun, 20 September 2015 19:10
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: dolik.rce on Sun, 20 September 2015 20:31
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: Didier on Sun, 20 September 2015 21:57
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Sun, 20 September 2015 23:36
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: dolik.rce on Mon, 21 September 2015 07:27
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: timsky on Mon, 21 September 2015 15:58
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: koldo on Mon, 21 September 2015 16:14
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Wed, 21 October 2015 20:30
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: Tom1 on Mon, 26 October 2015 09:51
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Mon, 26 October 2015 12:23
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: Tom1 on Mon, 26 October 2015 15:01
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: Tom1 on Mon, 26 October 2015 15:26
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Mon, 26 October 2015 18:59
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: Tom1 on Tue, 27 October 2015 09:20
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Tue, 27 October 2015 11:00
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: Tom1 on Tue, 27 October 2015 12:48
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Wed, 28 October 2015 07:58
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: Tom1 on Wed, 28 October 2015 08:06
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Wed, 28 October 2015 19:20
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 13:13
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 09:42
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 13:22
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 14:17
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 14:22
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 14:33
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 15:04
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 15:48
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 16:45
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 16:46
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 18:18
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 20:16
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Fri, 30 October 2015 12:17
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: Tom1 on Fri, 30 October 2015 14:39
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Fri, 30 October 2015 17:05
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: Tom1 on Fri, 30 October 2015 17:51
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Mon, 02 November 2015 17:17
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Mon, 02 November 2015 17:34
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: Tom1 on Mon, 26 October 2015 15:34
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Mon, 26 October 2015 18:58
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: Tom1 on Tue, 27 October 2015 09:01
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:45
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Wed, 28 October 2015 07:57
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:59
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mdelfede on Mon, 02 November 2015 18:10
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: Tom1 on Tue, 03 November 2015 09:27
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Tue, 03 November 2015 09:48
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: Tom1 on Tue, 03 November 2015 11:33
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Wed, 25 November 2015 13:14
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mirek on Tue, 03 November 2015 09:52
|
|
|
Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release
By: mdelfede on Thu, 26 November 2015 09:35
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu May 23 14:33:31 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02556 seconds
|
|
|