U++ framework
Do not panic. Ask here before giving up.

Home » Community » U++ community news and announcements » U++ 2017 beta
Re: U++ 2017 beta [message #47175 is a reply to message #47171] Sun, 25 December 2016 11:24 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
MrSarup
Messages: 30
Registered: December 2016
Member
Hi Mirek,
mirek wrote on Sun, 25 December 2016 09:52

Personally, I would prefer removing .spec file altogether.

.rpm based distros are Spanish village for me. IMO, our responsibility for nightly builds / releases should stop at producing tarball with makefile which builds (perhaps after some package installs) on any most targets. Platform specific packages should be out of ultimatepp.org responsibility...
There are too many target platforms to maintain directly...
Mirek


May be you did not see different possibility of using cross-platform FPM packages for distribution of source code.

Thus, I - as I disagree with you - have opened a seperate thread here and created a poll:

http://www.ultimatepp.org/forums/index.php?t=msg&goto=47 174&#msg_47174

I am now curious if you give a vote to my idea!
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message icon14.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: upp-10502-winxp32-compiled
Next Topic: On-line meeting before 2017 release
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Jul 18 00:44:27 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00889 seconds