mirek wrote on Tue, 25 April 2017 10:34

P.S.: Are you sure that your Test code is doing what you wanted it to do? It looks to me like there should be something like *rand++ in it...

The above testing code is a subset of my real code, where x is a value I just introduced to have a return value to show. It does not represent anything, and shouldn't be taken into account. The rand variable is a pointer to an array of random bools. I wanted to use it to create some randomness, but I didn't really succeed there. I solely wanted to point out the runtime of the different implementations.