Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Community » U++ community news and announcements » SVN UPDATE & .deb BUILD : Revision 951 - 2009-03-12
Re: SVN UPDATE & .deb BUILD : Revision 951 - 2009-03-12 [message #21436 is a reply to message #21432] Wed, 20 May 2009 09:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
koldo is currently offline  koldo
Messages: 3358
Registered: August 2008
Senior Veteran
Hello tojocky

Yes.
Quote:

Try src. It should be X11-universal.
You might need to install some libs and gcc...


That is it. Install in Ubuntu "build-essential" package and after that compile the .gz sources doing.

make
make install

If you have problems you can also install the newer .deb in http://www.ultimatepp.org/svnbuilds/, copy over it the last sources .gz and compile TheIDE package.

Best regards
Koldo


Best regards
Iñaki
Re: SVN UPDATE & .deb BUILD : Revision 951 - 2009-03-12 [message #21438 is a reply to message #21436] Wed, 20 May 2009 10:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tojocky is currently offline  tojocky
Messages: 607
Registered: April 2008
Location: UK
Contributor

OK!
I was compiled the source code... but I thing that readme is incomplete!

Need to write list of libraries to install.

Thank you your help!
Re: SVN UPDATE & .deb BUILD : Revision 951 - 2009-03-12 [message #21441 is a reply to message #21438] Wed, 20 May 2009 14:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
tojocky wrote on Wed, 20 May 2009 04:49

OK!
I was compiled the source code... but I thing that readme is incomplete!

Need to write list of libraries to install.

Thank you your help!


Will you? Wink

Mirek
Re: SVN UPDATE & .deb BUILD : Revision 951 - 2009-03-12 [message #21443 is a reply to message #21441] Wed, 20 May 2009 14:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tojocky is currently offline  tojocky
Messages: 607
Registered: April 2008
Location: UK
Contributor

luzr wrote on Wed, 20 May 2009 15:05

tojocky wrote on Wed, 20 May 2009 04:49

OK!
I was compiled the source code... but I thing that readme is incomplete!

Need to write list of libraries to install.

Thank you your help!


Will you? Wink

Mirek


OK!
I'm not sure that I will write all libraries, I'll try!
Re: SVN UPDATE & .deb BUILD : Revision 951 - 2009-03-12 [message #21452 is a reply to message #18211] Thu, 21 May 2009 13:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mr_ped is currently offline  mr_ped
Messages: 825
Registered: November 2005
Location: Czech Republic - Praha
Experienced Contributor
Kubuntu 9.04 (should be same as Ubuntu 9.04):

I downloaded latest src from google mirror ( upp-x11-src-1214.tar.gz ).

Additional packages I did install trough package manager (and all the dependencies for them ... in total it's LOT of packages):
build-essentials
libx11-dev
libxft-dev
libgtk2.0-dev

To unpack:
tar -xvvzf upp-x11-src-1214.tar.gz

To compile:
make

you should get binary "theide" (7MB here now) in your home directory.
Then if you wish, run (without sudo!):
make install

This will prepare theide to be used locally by your current user, i.e. it will set up assemblies, and directories in user's home directory. Or you can simply run theide and set up everything by hand.

I think with flagNOGTK flag it would require only first three additional packages, I will maybe try it later, if it works with current src package.
Re: SVN UPDATE & .deb BUILD : Revision 951 - 2009-03-12 [message #21458 is a reply to message #21452] Thu, 21 May 2009 16:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
Actually, I guess we could get the complete list of libraries from makefile (stupid me...).

I will do it soon.

Mirek
Re: SVN UPDATE & .deb BUILD : Revision 951 - 2009-03-12 [message #21466 is a reply to message #21458] Thu, 21 May 2009 21:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mr_ped is currently offline  mr_ped
Messages: 825
Registered: November 2005
Location: Czech Republic - Praha
Experienced Contributor
luzr wrote on Thu, 21 May 2009 16:35

Actually, I guess we could get the complete list of libraries from makefile (stupid me...).

I will do it soon.

Mirek


While that's certainly a proper first step, a list of .debs in some actual distribution will help to some users more.

But it should start with list of needed libs, I produced my list by simply waiting for compilation failure and searching for the file with apt-file utility. So I may have miss any libs which are used by U++ in general, but not by IDE.
Re: SVN UPDATE & .deb BUILD : Revision 951 - 2009-03-12 [message #21479 is a reply to message #21466] Fri, 22 May 2009 10:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
mr_ped wrote on Thu, 21 May 2009 15:34

luzr wrote on Thu, 21 May 2009 16:35

Actually, I guess we could get the complete list of libraries from makefile (stupid me...).

I will do it soon.

Mirek


While that's certainly a proper first step, a list of .debs in some actual distribution will help to some users more.

But it should start with list of needed libs, I produced my list by simply waiting for compilation failure and searching for the file with apt-file utility. So I may have miss any libs which are used by U++ in general, but not by IDE.


Luckily, the set is almost the same for TheIDE and U++.

The exceptions are things like OpenGL or database access libraries. But I guess you do not want to have them installed by default anyway..

Mirek
Re: SVN UPDATE & .deb BUILD : Revision 951 - 2009-03-12 [message #21482 is a reply to message #18211] Fri, 22 May 2009 12:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mr_ped is currently offline  mr_ped
Messages: 825
Registered: November 2005
Location: Czech Republic - Praha
Experienced Contributor
If we are going to improve the readme in src package, I would highly recommend to mention those libs (and package names) too (as "optional").

I don't have problem to support Ubuntu's list of .deb packages needed, I finally tried Ubuntu installation in VirtualBox and while it's far from usable for actual programming (at least untill I figure out how to get bigger resolution then 800x600, probably I need to edit xorg.conf), it works like charm for experiments + compilation under latest OS version from CD ISO image, so I can try every new Ubuntu without endangering production OS and search for needed packages and provide you with the list.

To test some OGL/SDL/various DB things, I should probably try some U++ projects from examples/reference?
Any idea, which ones are most likely to exercise full dev support of desired libs? I think OGL/SDL have each their own example, so those will be easy, but I'm not sure about DBs.
Re: SVN UPDATE & .deb BUILD : Revision 951 - 2009-03-12 [message #21493 is a reply to message #21482] Fri, 22 May 2009 20:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
reference/SQL_*
reference/OpenGL

Mirek
Re: SVN UPDATE & .deb BUILD : Revision 951 - 2009-03-12 [message #21497 is a reply to message #21482] Sat, 23 May 2009 01:38 Go to previous message
koldo is currently offline  koldo
Messages: 3358
Registered: August 2008
Senior Veteran
Hello mr_ped

If you use Ubuntu and you can not install the full OS there is one additional option to VirtualBox or other virtualization system. It is called Portable Ubuntu.

http://portableubuntu.demonccc.cloudius.com.ar/

It is an Ubuntu system running as a Windows application. You do not need to install it, just run it so it is easy to carry in an usb memory. All Ubuntu applications appear on the Windows desktop.

Using it from an XP I have compiled the last theide from an older one that was in a 32 bits .deb package, just like I did in the real Ubuntu.

I do know that there is no better GNU/Linux than the real one, but in special cases this could be another option and U++ works well in it.

Best regards
Koldo


Best regards
Iñaki
Previous Topic: Major redesign of MT in GUI
Next Topic: Nominate U++ for sf.net community choice awards!
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Apr 29 00:01:13 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04201 seconds