U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » ArrayCtrl, HeaderCtrl & GridCtrl » Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) [message #19831]

Mon, 26 January 2009 02:44

Novo
Messages: 1358
Registered: December 2006

Ultimate Contributor

Linux x86_64 Ubuntu 7.10
Application: HomeBudget

Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)

/home/ssg/dvlp/cpp/upp/svn/uppsrc/GridCtrl/GridCtrl.cpp:1310

Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line

/home/ssg/dvlp/cpp/upp/svn/uppsrc/GridCtrl/GridCtrl.cpp:1415

Regards,
Novo

[Updated on: Mon, 26 January 2009 02:56]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) [message #19835 is a reply to message #19831]

Mon, 26 January 2009 10:04

mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

Novo wrote on Sun, 25 January 2009 20:44

I hope these are now fixed.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) [message #19851 is a reply to message #19835]

Tue, 27 January 2009 06:29

Novo
Messages: 1358
Registered: December 2006

Ultimate Contributor

luzr wrote on Mon, 26 January 2009 04:04

I hope these are now fixed.

Not all yet.

GridCtrl.cpp:1417

Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
  Upp::GridCtrl::Paint(Upp::Draw&) 0x59D59E /home/ssg/dvlp/cpp/upp/svn/out/GCC.Debug.Debug_full.Gui.Shared/sf_l10n
      0x0  
     /home/ssg/dvlp/cpp/upp/svn/uppsrc/GridCtrl/GridCtrl.cpp:1417

val = hi.IsConvertion() && vi.IsConvertion() ? GetConvertedColumn(id, it.val) : it.val;

Actually, the problem seems to happen in

Value GridCtrl::GetConvertedColumn(int col, const Value &v) const
{
	Convert *conv = edits[col].convert; // Seems to return invalid address ...
	return conv ? conv->Format(v) : v;
}

Probably, it is my fault, but nothing wrong is happening on 32-bit Windows ...

After googling on "Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line" I got impression that it means corrupted stack.

Regards,
Novo

Report message to a moderator