Home » Community » PR, media coverage, articles and documentation » There were competitors in the name of "U++"
|
|
|
|
| Re: There were competitors in the name of "U++" [message #23082 is a reply to message #23080] |
Wed, 16 September 2009 09:29  |
 |
koldo
Messages: 3356
Registered: August 2008
|
Senior Veteran |
|
|
Hello Sergey
Both are very unpleasant.
It is curious that in the second case they say:
| Quote: |
It was decided ... to change the name of the UNL Consortium into U++ Consortium in order to avoid name or brand conflicts with other institutions that already use this acronym
|
I think that it is impossible to have an acronym so unique that no company or organization in the world uses it. I know cases of it for very big companies with thousands of workers.
For example, there are two companies with Gamesa name:
- Wind Mill manufacturer, staff 7200, http://www.gamesacorp.com/en
- Cookies manufacturer, http://www.gamesa.com
Best regards
Koldo
Best regards
Iñaki
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Apr 19 16:25:04 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02952 seconds
|
Members
Pages
Help
Register
Login
Home
