U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Clang / lld (

) 1 Vote

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Clang / lld [message #51614]

Fri, 19 April 2019 22:50

Novo
Messages: 1358
Registered: December 2006

Ultimate Contributor

mirek wrote on Sat, 13 April 2019 07:07

These are things I would like to have solved, but do not have resources to:

- Fix uldar - old U++ linker for mingw by Tomas Rylek, that is superfast (compared to ld.exe supplied with mingw), but unfortunately stopped working around mingw 2012 version. This would make mingw much more attractive for us (well, there is still that poor TLS handling, but maybe that will get solved over time too).

I personally would take a look at LLD first. Gold linker is supposed to be several times faster than ld, but it doesn't support PE/COFF. LLD is supposed to be several times faster than the gold linker, and it supports PE/COFF. So, there is no need to reinvent the wheel.

Regards,
Novo

[Updated on: Wed, 24 April 2019 10:56] by Moderator

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Clang / lld By: Novo on Fri, 19 April 2019 22:50
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: mirek on Sat, 20 April 2019 00:56
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: Novo on Sat, 20 April 2019 01:05
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: mirek on Tue, 23 April 2019 16:38
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: Novo on Tue, 23 April 2019 17:29
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: mirek on Wed, 24 April 2019 09:04
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: cbpporter on Wed, 24 April 2019 09:50
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: mirek on Wed, 24 April 2019 10:51
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: mirek on Wed, 24 April 2019 10:56
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: mirek on Wed, 24 April 2019 14:45
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: mirek on Thu, 25 April 2019 07:57
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: Novo on Thu, 25 April 2019 16:14
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: cbpporter on Fri, 03 May 2019 10:27
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: mirek on Fri, 03 May 2019 11:50
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: cbpporter on Fri, 03 May 2019 15:11
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: Novo on Fri, 03 May 2019 17:49
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: mirek on Sat, 04 May 2019 08:48
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: Tom1 on Fri, 10 May 2019 11:49
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: mirek on Sat, 11 May 2019 16:05
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: Novo on Sat, 11 May 2019 19:29
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: Tom1 on Mon, 13 May 2019 09:37

Previous Topic:	Two new nasty GCC warnings that I am going to disable
Next Topic:	Example websocket SSL

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue May 21 21:34:25 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02489 seconds