Well, those "CLOS" gyus are totally off as all dynamic programming advocates. Even reading their material:
Quote:
C++ requires any redesign in the classes and methods to be completely consistent and correct across the entire application source code before a design modification can be compiled, let alone tested.
...and they think this is a disadvantage?!!!!
Is it so hard to understand that using static type checking, compiler catches many bugs for you, makeing development and refactoring of very large applications easy and safe?
Damn, sometimes I refactor code using C++ by invoking compiler on unfinished change just so he tells me what to fix (via errors indicating type/signature inconsistency).
Members
Pages
Help
Register
Login
Home
