U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Community » Coffee corner » Pick overloaded by Rvalue?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? [message #19285 is a reply to message #19283]

Mon, 24 November 2008 10:47

bytefield is currently offline

bytefield
Messages: 210
Registered: December 2007

Experienced Member

So, is better for Upp and for us to stay away from C++ new standard.

luzr wrote

Unfortunately, the main disadvantage of rvalue references is that they do not compose:

struct Foo {
Vector<int> x, y;
};

- such construct would lack auto-generated pick constructor.

I think that is solved by using rvalue references + "move" constructor, that if every object implement move constructor(thought not auto-generated).

Anyway, why take so much to implement C++0x? I see g++ advancing pretty fast while implement new standard, e.g. now it support rvalue references in 4.3.2 (with -std=c++0x) and initializer lists in g++ from svn. However, is better implmentig it slowly, it means i will have 3 years from now to learn new standard and i think 3 years are enough.

cdabbd745f1234c2751ee1f932d1dd75

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: bytefield on Tue, 11 November 2008 23:44
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: mirek on Wed, 12 November 2008 00:29
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: cbpporter on Wed, 12 November 2008 08:01
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: bytefield on Wed, 12 November 2008 10:48
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: mirek on Wed, 12 November 2008 11:00
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: bytefield on Wed, 12 November 2008 12:20
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: mdelfede on Wed, 12 November 2008 16:05
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: Mindtraveller on Wed, 12 November 2008 19:34
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: bytefield on Wed, 12 November 2008 20:33
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: captainc on Wed, 12 November 2008 20:27
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: bytefield on Wed, 12 November 2008 20:37
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: mirek on Wed, 12 November 2008 22:04
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: unodgs on Wed, 12 November 2008 23:46
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: captainc on Thu, 13 November 2008 00:20
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: mirek on Thu, 13 November 2008 14:37
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: mirek on Thu, 13 November 2008 14:38
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: cbpporter on Fri, 21 November 2008 14:17
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: captainc on Fri, 21 November 2008 19:48
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: cbpporter on Sat, 22 November 2008 10:04
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: unodgs on Sat, 22 November 2008 10:49
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: mirek on Sat, 22 November 2008 13:19
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: mirek on Sat, 22 November 2008 13:22
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: unodgs on Sat, 22 November 2008 14:54
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: captainc on Sun, 23 November 2008 20:53
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: cbpporter on Mon, 24 November 2008 01:18
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: bytefield on Mon, 24 November 2008 06:55
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: mirek on Mon, 24 November 2008 08:32
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: mirek on Wed, 12 November 2008 21:54
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: mr_ped on Mon, 24 November 2008 09:05
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: bytefield on Mon, 24 November 2008 10:47
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: mirek on Mon, 24 November 2008 11:59
		Re: Pick overloaded by Rvalue? By: captainc on Mon, 24 November 2008 19:25

Previous Topic:	Looking for someone to convert a ulimate++ project to Microsoft Visual C++ project
Next Topic:	Fantastic work!!

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Sat May 11 19:43:07 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02670 seconds