cbpporter Messages: 1401 Registered: September 2007
Ultimate Contributor
andrei_natanael wrote on Thu, 02 April 2009 15:04
I don't see why someone would stay with U++ 2008.1 or other release.
Some people, especially management refuse to work with non stable version, and will refuse any bug fix until it not incorporated into next minor version at least.
I also have a personal “no-support” app where only stable is used. When something is wrong and it's my fault, I fix it. When it's U++'s fault, “no-support” means that the issue is filled as non-fixable.
On my old job there was an unhappy coincidence where the single time a rolling version was installed it failed to build (some silly bug in Mt) and that practically sealed the deal and set 2008.1 and TheIDE from it as the only acceptable version ).
Members
Pages
Help
Register
Login
Home
).
