U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) [message #29905 is a reply to message #29904]

Mon, 29 November 2010 10:50

mirek
Messages: 13980
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

Yes. Basically, the goal is to to wipe out most of these #ifdef PLATFOM_ lines from CtrlCore. Except that I guess it still makes sense to have X11/Win32 implementations there...

Also, doing so, I think it even makes sense to make the system flexible so that more GUI modes can be available in single binary. I can imagine e.g. webserver that provides some diagnostics in Win32/X11 GUI...

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: kohait00 on Fri, 02 July 2010 10:19
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: Mindtraveller on Fri, 02 July 2010 16:24
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: kohait00 on Fri, 02 July 2010 16:53
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: kohait00 on Thu, 18 November 2010 09:15
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: koldo on Thu, 18 November 2010 11:13
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: kohait00 on Thu, 18 November 2010 11:19
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: koldo on Thu, 18 November 2010 11:23
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Sat, 27 November 2010 18:21
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: dolik.rce on Sat, 27 November 2010 19:00
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Sat, 27 November 2010 19:51
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: koldo on Sun, 28 November 2010 09:51
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Sun, 28 November 2010 12:21
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: unodgs on Sun, 28 November 2010 12:27
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Sun, 28 November 2010 12:51
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: Tom1 on Mon, 29 November 2010 10:11
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: zsolt on Fri, 17 December 2010 12:16
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Sat, 18 December 2010 09:37
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: kohait00 on Tue, 05 July 2011 16:28
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: chickenk on Tue, 05 July 2011 18:14
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: kohait00 on Tue, 05 July 2011 19:20
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mr_ped on Mon, 29 November 2010 10:32
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Mon, 29 November 2010 10:50
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: Tom1 on Mon, 29 November 2010 12:56
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Mon, 29 November 2010 19:08

Previous Topic:	U++ video control to come soon
Next Topic:	Rainbow Framebuffer - theide running

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri May 17 23:25:36 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02443 seconds