Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » SCGI Class
Re: SCGI Class [message #29081 is a reply to message #29079] Mon, 04 October 2010 19:19 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
jeremy_c is currently offline  jeremy_c
Messages: 175
Registered: August 2007
Location: Ohio, USA
Experienced Member
luzr wrote on Mon, 04 October 2010 13:12

Looking at it, I have strong impression that in this case it would be more logical to use virtual methods instead of Callbacks. I guess even HelloScgi would be quite simpler that way..

Also, as this seems to be quite short piece of code, I consider moving it to Web package (you would retain access rights there too).

What do you think about this?


I was thinking the same about virtual methods vs. callbacks.

In regards to moving to the web package, that depends on how you would like the overall structure. Say someone else comes along and makes FastCGI and then WSCGI... How would you envision those being added? I'm not saying someone is, but just something to think about.

It does seem odd out there in uppsrc/ all by it's lonesome.

Jeremy
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: How should we deal with SQL column names in conflict with SQL standard keywords
Next Topic: What's up with Google subversion mirror?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun May 12 14:06:38 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02637 seconds