U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. [message #31765 is a reply to message #31696]

Fri, 25 March 2011 13:26

kohait00 is currently offline

kohait00
Messages: 939
Registered: July 2009
Location: Germany

Experienced Contributor

still interested in that topic?

i think having owned Ctrls just like that wont do much, since you have to know/reference the controls somehow/somewhere, you will end up traversing the child link tree, and doing dynamic_casts allover.

ultimate is heavily based on compile time connection of the application parts, means, if you have a Ctrl and place it somewehere, then you probably will hook up some static (not runtime specific) functionality to it, within your code.

a heap creation of Ctrls implys some sort of dynamic application behavior. for what the controls need to be fairly straight forward in handling, i.e. only Get/SetData interface unsing, only WhenAction Callback using, etc.. anything else is too specific.

i basicly have the same problem. that's why some time ago, i started the CtrlProp package in bazaar. a uniform api to query/control some properties of Controls, without actually knowing its type.

another project i am currently takling is the generation / modification of Controls in its position, a control factory so to say, which would be extended using *decorator* design pattern.
meanwhile see the CtrlPos package. which is part of it.

maybe thats sth you can use as well. see also FormEditor, which is another nice work, from someone else.

as soon as the ctrl factory is in a fitting shape i'll provide it in bazaar.

cheers

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 17:18
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: kohait00 on Wed, 16 March 2011 17:26
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 17:29
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 17:30
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 17:39
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: kohait00 on Wed, 16 March 2011 18:01
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 18:10
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 18:29
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 18:35
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 18:43
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 19:24
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 02:13
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: kohait00 on Fri, 18 March 2011 11:01
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 14:39
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 15:21
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 15:40
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 16:22
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 16:34
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: mirek on Fri, 18 March 2011 19:35
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: mirek on Fri, 18 March 2011 19:32
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 23:02
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: mirek on Fri, 18 March 2011 23:18
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 23:34
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: mirek on Fri, 18 March 2011 23:40
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Sat, 19 March 2011 00:02
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: mirek on Sat, 19 March 2011 00:37
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Sat, 19 March 2011 01:30
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Sat, 19 March 2011 01:35
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: mirek on Sat, 19 March 2011 10:59
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: kohait00 on Sun, 20 March 2011 10:32
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Sun, 20 March 2011 14:07
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Sun, 20 March 2011 14:11
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Sun, 20 March 2011 14:28
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: kohait00 on Fri, 25 March 2011 13:26
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Sun, 27 March 2011 15:33
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: kohait00 on Sun, 17 April 2011 17:25
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Tue, 19 April 2011 06:00
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: kohait00 on Tue, 19 April 2011 09:14
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Tue, 19 April 2011 14:09
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: kohait00 on Tue, 19 April 2011 18:05
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 20 April 2011 02:44
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: kohait00 on Wed, 20 April 2011 08:51
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 20 April 2011 19:24
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 20 April 2011 21:17
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 20 April 2011 21:23
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: Lance on Wed, 20 April 2011 21:38
		Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children. By: kohait00 on Thu, 28 April 2011 16:32
		revised ownership change By: kohait00 on Thu, 28 April 2011 18:28
		Re: revised ownership change By: Lance on Thu, 28 April 2011 21:45
		Re: revised ownership change By: kohait00 on Thu, 28 April 2011 21:57
		Re: revised ownership change By: Lance on Thu, 28 April 2011 23:18
		Re: revised ownership change By: Lance on Thu, 28 April 2011 23:31
		Re: revised ownership change By: Lance on Thu, 28 April 2011 23:54
		Re: revised ownership change By: kohait00 on Sun, 22 May 2011 21:58
		Re: revised ownership change By: Mindtraveller on Mon, 23 May 2011 00:28
		Re: revised ownership change By: kohait00 on Mon, 23 May 2011 11:16
		Re: revised ownership change By: Lance on Mon, 06 June 2011 05:11
		Re: revised ownership change By: Lance on Mon, 06 June 2011 05:05

Previous Topic:	Get MAC addresses for windows and linux
Next Topic:	Testing framework in U++.

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Tue May 14 19:49:36 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03072 seconds