|
|
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
Re: revised ownership change [message #32169 is a reply to message #32168] |
Thu, 28 April 2011 23:18 |
Lance
Messages: 527 Registered: March 2007
|
Contributor |
|
|
Personally I don't dislike Detach at all. It's hard to think of a situation where Detach causes problem more than Array::Detach does. The only problem is that it will make the code harder to understand for somebody who doesn't go deep enough on this topic.
And if a Child control can be Detached, could it be reattached to another parent? If the answer is not, than Detach would be perfectly fine. If the answer is yes, essentially you open the door for add a user newed object which Mirek objects.
So either:
1. Call parent.CreateOwned<ChildType>() to create the object on heap and add as parent's child;
2. When the child is expected to be killed, hide it, access all its properties, and call parent.Remove(..)
or
1. Call parent.CreateOwned<ChildType>() to create the object on heap and add as parent's child;
2. When the child is no longer needed, Detach it and remember the returned poiter.
3. Access its properties, and delete it manually.
The advantage of case 2 over case 1 is that it allow the parent be destructed while the child remain valid, think about the case where the parent itself is its parent's dynamically created child.
The disadvantage of case 2 over case 1 is that it requires the library user to use delete. But since he/she has to delete the object returned by Array::Detach, it should not hurt that much.
If you agree with my above analysis, I go with case 2 too. Or do you have other recommendation?
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 17:18
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: kohait00 on Wed, 16 March 2011 17:26
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 17:29
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 17:30
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 17:39
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: kohait00 on Wed, 16 March 2011 18:01
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 18:10
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 18:29
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 18:35
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 18:43
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Wed, 16 March 2011 19:24
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 02:13
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: kohait00 on Fri, 18 March 2011 11:01
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 14:39
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 15:21
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 15:40
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 16:22
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 16:34
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: mirek on Fri, 18 March 2011 19:35
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: mirek on Fri, 18 March 2011 19:32
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 23:02
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: mirek on Fri, 18 March 2011 23:18
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Fri, 18 March 2011 23:34
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: mirek on Fri, 18 March 2011 23:40
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Sat, 19 March 2011 00:02
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: mirek on Sat, 19 March 2011 00:37
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Sat, 19 March 2011 01:30
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Sat, 19 March 2011 01:35
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: mirek on Sat, 19 March 2011 10:59
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: kohait00 on Sun, 20 March 2011 10:32
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Sun, 20 March 2011 14:07
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Sun, 20 March 2011 14:11
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Sun, 20 March 2011 14:28
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: kohait00 on Fri, 25 March 2011 13:26
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Sun, 27 March 2011 15:33
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: kohait00 on Sun, 17 April 2011 17:25
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Tue, 19 April 2011 06:00
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: kohait00 on Tue, 19 April 2011 09:14
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Tue, 19 April 2011 14:09
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: kohait00 on Tue, 19 April 2011 18:05
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Wed, 20 April 2011 02:44
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: kohait00 on Wed, 20 April 2011 08:51
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Wed, 20 April 2011 19:24
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Wed, 20 April 2011 21:17
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Wed, 20 April 2011 21:23
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: Lance on Wed, 20 April 2011 21:38
|
|
|
Re: Proposed change to U++ to allow owning children.
By: kohait00 on Thu, 28 April 2011 16:32
|
|
|
revised ownership change
By: kohait00 on Thu, 28 April 2011 18:28
|
|
|
Re: revised ownership change
By: Lance on Thu, 28 April 2011 21:45
|
|
|
Re: revised ownership change
By: kohait00 on Thu, 28 April 2011 21:57
|
|
|
Re: revised ownership change
By: Lance on Thu, 28 April 2011 23:18
|
|
|
Re: revised ownership change
By: Lance on Thu, 28 April 2011 23:31
|
|
|
Re: revised ownership change
By: Lance on Thu, 28 April 2011 23:54
|
|
|
Re: revised ownership change
|
|
|
Re: revised ownership change
|
|
|
Re: revised ownership change
|
|
|
Re: revised ownership change
By: Lance on Mon, 06 June 2011 05:11
|
|
|
Re: revised ownership change
By: Lance on Mon, 06 June 2011 05:05
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue May 14 02:15:05 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03218 seconds
|
|
|