U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » Rect_<T>::SetNull not correct for Rectf (Rect_<double>)

Mon, 11 April 2011 22:25

hans
Messages: 44
Registered: March 2006
Location: Germany

Member

Hi,
latest addition of SetNull is implemented as

void   SetNull()                        { left = top = right = bottom = Null; }

but template specialisation for Rect_<double>(Null) is implemented as

template <>
inline Rect_<double>::Rect_(const Nuller&) {
	left = top = 0;
	right = bottom = -1;
}

I would suggest to implement SetNull as

void   SetNull()                        { *this= Rect_(Null); }

which works for Rect_<T> for generic T and specialisation.

Thanks,
Hans

[Updated on: Mon, 11 April 2011 22:27]

		Rect_<T>::SetNull not correct for Rectf (Rect_<double>) By: hans on Mon, 11 April 2011 22:25
		Re: Rect_<T>::SetNull not correct for Rectf (Rect_<double>) By: kohait00 on Tue, 12 April 2011 09:44
		Re: Rect_<T>::SetNull not correct for Rectf (Rect_<double>) By: mirek on Sat, 16 April 2011 20:42
		Re: Rect_<T>::SetNull not correct for Rectf (Rect_<double>) By: kohait00 on Sun, 17 April 2011 14:39
		Re: Rect_<T>::SetNull not correct for Rectf (Rect_<double>) By: kohait00 on Thu, 21 April 2011 08:28
		Re: Rect_<T>::SetNull not correct for Rectf (Rect_<double>) By: mirek on Mon, 25 April 2011 10:46

Previous Topic:	ADDs: ValueMap
Next Topic:	FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V

Goto Forum:

] [

]

Current Time: Thu May 09 07:54:02 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01835 seconds