U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too [message #32838 is a reply to message #32836]

Tue, 14 June 2011 08:45

dolik.rce is currently offline

dolik.rce
Messages: 1789
Registered: August 2008
Location: Czech Republic

Ultimate Contributor

dolik.rce@gmail.com

mirek wrote on Tue, 14 June 2011 08:15

dolik.rce wrote on Tue, 14 June 2011 01:44

mirek wrote on Mon, 13 June 2011 20:12

W.r.t. complex, maybe in this particular, would not it be a good ideas to use std::complex this time?

Mirek

Hi Mirek,
Std::complex is not a bad implementation. It is versatile, optimized and also has a good support in gdb Smile

Smile

On the other hand, I'd like to have sommething more "U++-like". What about wrapper class that would have std::complex as a base and just add functions like ToString, Xmlize etc.?

Honza

Some of them could be done as external function, just like we did it for int/double...

Mirek

I know it is possible in most cases... But the wrapper has more pros that I forgot to mention. E.g. it is a clean way to "move" complex to Upp namespace... I am too lazy person to type "using std::complex;" every time I want to use it Smile

Smile

(And hardcoding the using clause into U++ doesn't feel right...)

Honza

[Updated on: Tue, 14 June 2011 08:46]

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		[DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: kohait00 on Fri, 10 June 2011 16:00
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: dolik.rce on Fri, 10 June 2011 22:52
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: kohait00 on Sun, 12 June 2011 09:30
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: Tom1 on Sun, 12 June 2011 18:04
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: koldo on Mon, 13 June 2011 08:47
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: Tom1 on Mon, 13 June 2011 11:20
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: dolik.rce on Mon, 13 June 2011 12:15
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: Tom1 on Mon, 13 June 2011 19:24
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: mirek on Mon, 13 June 2011 20:12
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: dolik.rce on Tue, 14 June 2011 07:44
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: mirek on Tue, 14 June 2011 08:15
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: dolik.rce on Tue, 14 June 2011 08:45
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: kohait00 on Mon, 20 June 2011 09:36
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: kohait00 on Mon, 20 June 2011 13:44
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: kohait00 on Mon, 20 June 2011 14:24
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: kohait00 on Tue, 21 June 2011 19:00
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: kohait00 on Wed, 22 June 2011 13:12
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: mirek on Sat, 25 June 2011 19:48
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: mirek on Sun, 26 June 2011 09:30
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: kohait00 on Sun, 26 June 2011 10:47
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: kohait00 on Sun, 26 June 2011 16:05
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: mirek on Mon, 27 June 2011 18:04
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: kohait00 on Tue, 28 June 2011 09:04
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: mirek on Tue, 28 June 2011 09:16
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: kohait00 on Tue, 28 June 2011 09:22
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: kohait00 on Tue, 05 July 2011 13:28
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: mirek on Wed, 06 July 2011 13:17
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: kohait00 on Wed, 06 July 2011 14:48
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: mirek on Wed, 06 July 2011 17:25
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: kohait00 on Wed, 06 July 2011 17:50
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: mirek on Wed, 06 July 2011 19:02
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: mirek on Wed, 06 July 2011 19:03
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: mirek on Wed, 06 July 2011 19:31
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: kohait00 on Wed, 06 July 2011 21:48
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: unknown user on Wed, 06 July 2011 23:23
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: kohait00 on Wed, 06 July 2011 23:38
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: Zbych on Wed, 06 July 2011 22:19
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: mirek on Thu, 07 July 2011 08:19
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: kohait00 on Thu, 07 July 2011 08:23
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: mirek on Thu, 07 July 2011 17:40
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: kohait00 on Mon, 25 July 2011 10:41
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: mirek on Sat, 30 July 2011 10:11
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: kohait00 on Sun, 31 July 2011 15:41
		Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 'complex' datatype, to Value too By: koldo on Mon, 01 August 2011 09:50

Previous Topic:	Bugs in Tuple, RemoveSorted and in Scribble Example
Next Topic:	PLATFORM_X11 warnings

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Mon May 20 22:22:02 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00842 seconds