Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Skylark timer jobs...
Re: Skylark timer jobs... [message #40929 is a reply to message #40928] |
Tue, 08 October 2013 21:58 |
|
mirek
Messages: 13980 Registered: November 2005
|
Ultimate Member |
|
|
[quote title=dolik.rce wrote on Tue, 08 October 2013 15:10][quote title=mirek wrote on Tue, 08 October 2013 19:55]dolik.rce wrote on Tue, 08 October 2013 12:13 | Wouldn't separate timer in each preforked process could cause same job running in each process?
|
I guess that quite depends on usage (and that would be limited by what is "illegal").
Anyway, after some thinking about real-life examples, I would say making it illegal would work, but would not be really practical. Now I agree that we need sharing
One ugly issue though... By adding jobs to the main process, you make it more vulnerable to crashing. Plus, perhaps crashing timer process should not delete timer queue.
So to sum it, storing the timer queue into file system suddenly starts to seem like quite a good option!
Mirek
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun May 19 15:02:51 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00913 seconds
|