Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Community » Coffee corner » Banana PI
Re: Banana PI [message #44037 is a reply to message #44034] Wed, 17 December 2014 08:46 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Mindtraveller is currently offline  Mindtraveller
Messages: 917
Registered: August 2007
Location: Russia, Moscow rgn.
Experienced Contributor

Actually U++ supports framebuffer-based rasterization and it is certainly one of biggest advantages among competitors (like qt). That is why, in my opinion, we must have framebuffer infrastructure working well. U++ is lightweight and effective which is the second big advantage on ARM and MIPS CPUs.
So we really have an opportunity to make U++ one of widespread frameworks for embedded systems.
My experience with U++ on slow systems shows it's fully capable and robust. With its lightness, effective basic structures and standalone GUI, U++ is worth being leading embedded framework.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: How would you design a good copy/move semantics system?
Next Topic: Free IT related books - Packt Publishing
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed May 15 14:53:29 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02719 seconds