U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Considering different approach to Win32 release

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release [message #45288 is a reply to message #45282]

Wed, 28 October 2015 07:57

mirek is currently offline

mirek
Messages: 13980
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

cbpporter wrote on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:55

Thank for the answers Mirek!

I tried with upp-win32-9087.7z.

After this step is done, maybe it is time to consider a more modern update mechanic? Big downloads and installs take away the old advantage of U++ of getting it up and running and updated using nightly builds.

Agreed, but perhaps not for this release. (It will take significant time to develop).

Quote:

I missed the VS2015 explanation. Does that mean that U++ now needs C++11? Our official compiler in 2010 .

No, not yet. That said, we would like like to move there eventually.

Anyway, it is true that with C++11, transfer semantics issues were changed, so some minimal changes to the code, backward compatible with C++98, are needed. It took about 5 minutes to fix theide, so no big deal.

Quote:

And what about MINGW not recognizing nullptr and other things? I think that the switch to MINGW will result in a lot of compatibility patches in user's code since MSC does take its fair share of liberties.

(fixed)

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Sun, 20 September 2015 19:10
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: dolik.rce on Sun, 20 September 2015 20:31
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Didier on Sun, 20 September 2015 21:57
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Sun, 20 September 2015 23:36
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: dolik.rce on Mon, 21 September 2015 07:27
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: timsky on Mon, 21 September 2015 15:58
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: koldo on Mon, 21 September 2015 16:14
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Wed, 21 October 2015 20:30
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Mon, 26 October 2015 09:51
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Mon, 26 October 2015 12:23
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Mon, 26 October 2015 15:01
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Mon, 26 October 2015 15:26
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Mon, 26 October 2015 18:59
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Tue, 27 October 2015 09:20
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Tue, 27 October 2015 11:00
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Tue, 27 October 2015 11:26
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Tue, 27 October 2015 12:25
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Tue, 27 October 2015 12:48
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Wed, 28 October 2015 07:58
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Wed, 28 October 2015 08:06
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Wed, 28 October 2015 10:53
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Wed, 28 October 2015 11:10
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Wed, 28 October 2015 11:32
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Mindtraveller on Wed, 28 October 2015 16:39
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Wed, 28 October 2015 16:48
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Wed, 28 October 2015 19:20
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Thu, 29 October 2015 09:30
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 13:13
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Thu, 29 October 2015 13:43
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 09:42
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 13:22
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 14:17
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 14:22
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 14:33
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 15:04
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Thu, 29 October 2015 15:26
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 15:48
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 16:45
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 16:46
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 18:18
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 20:16
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Fri, 30 October 2015 10:13
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Fri, 30 October 2015 12:17
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Fri, 30 October 2015 14:39
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Fri, 30 October 2015 17:05
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Fri, 30 October 2015 17:51
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Mon, 02 November 2015 17:17
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Mon, 02 November 2015 17:34
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Mon, 26 October 2015 15:34
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Mon, 26 October 2015 18:58
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Tue, 27 October 2015 09:01
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:29
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:45
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:55
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Wed, 28 October 2015 07:57
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:39
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:59
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mdelfede on Mon, 02 November 2015 18:10
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Tue, 03 November 2015 09:27
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Tue, 03 November 2015 09:48
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Tue, 03 November 2015 11:33
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Wed, 25 November 2015 13:14
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Tue, 03 November 2015 09:52
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mdelfede on Thu, 26 November 2015 09:35

Previous Topic:	mingw/gdb troubles
Next Topic:	Ideas on U++ as library

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Wed May 15 19:59:48 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01878 seconds