U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Considering different approach to Win32 release

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release [message #45329 is a reply to message #45328]

Fri, 30 October 2015 17:05

mirek is currently offline

mirek
Messages: 13980
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

Tom1 wrote on Fri, 30 October 2015 14:39

Hi,

I tried with 9114 with not much luck. It did not detect MSC15.

I installed step-by-step more features from Visual Studio Community 2015 until after installing "Windows and Web Development > Universal Windows App Development Tools > Tools (1.1.1) and Windows SDK (10.0.10240)" TheIDE finally found MSC15 and MSC15x64.

Well, after the hypothesis that you do NOT have in fact SDK installed, I have reverted changes for your tree (with missing SDK) - I think it is better that it is not installed than installed and not working (because of missing SDK).

Quote:

Compiling ProtectTest on MSC15 (32bit) succeeds, but running results in message "Bad key !!&Do you want to continue anyways ?", which is pretty strange since the key is correct and intact. Does this work correctly on your machine?

EDIT: In fact many times the result is 'crash on start'. Seems a bit unstable behavior -- how is that possible?

EDIT belongs to ProtectTest?

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Sun, 20 September 2015 19:10
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: dolik.rce on Sun, 20 September 2015 20:31
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Didier on Sun, 20 September 2015 21:57
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Sun, 20 September 2015 23:36
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: dolik.rce on Mon, 21 September 2015 07:27
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: timsky on Mon, 21 September 2015 15:58
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: koldo on Mon, 21 September 2015 16:14
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Wed, 21 October 2015 20:30
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Mon, 26 October 2015 09:51
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Mon, 26 October 2015 12:23
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Mon, 26 October 2015 15:01
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Mon, 26 October 2015 15:26
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Mon, 26 October 2015 18:59
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Tue, 27 October 2015 09:20
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Tue, 27 October 2015 11:00
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Tue, 27 October 2015 11:26
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Tue, 27 October 2015 12:25
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Tue, 27 October 2015 12:48
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Wed, 28 October 2015 07:58
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Wed, 28 October 2015 08:06
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Wed, 28 October 2015 10:53
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Wed, 28 October 2015 11:10
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Wed, 28 October 2015 11:32
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Mindtraveller on Wed, 28 October 2015 16:39
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Wed, 28 October 2015 16:48
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Wed, 28 October 2015 19:20
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Thu, 29 October 2015 09:30
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 13:13
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Thu, 29 October 2015 13:43
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 09:42
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 13:22
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 14:17
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 14:22
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 14:33
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 15:04
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Thu, 29 October 2015 15:26
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 15:48
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 16:45
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 16:46
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 18:18
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 20:16
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Fri, 30 October 2015 10:13
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Fri, 30 October 2015 12:17
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Fri, 30 October 2015 14:39
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Fri, 30 October 2015 17:05
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Fri, 30 October 2015 17:51
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Mon, 02 November 2015 17:17
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Mon, 02 November 2015 17:34
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Mon, 26 October 2015 15:34
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Mon, 26 October 2015 18:58
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Tue, 27 October 2015 09:01
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:29
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:45
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:55
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Wed, 28 October 2015 07:57
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:39
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:59
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mdelfede on Mon, 02 November 2015 18:10
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Tue, 03 November 2015 09:27
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Tue, 03 November 2015 09:48
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Tue, 03 November 2015 11:33
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Wed, 25 November 2015 13:14
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Tue, 03 November 2015 09:52
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mdelfede on Thu, 26 November 2015 09:35

Previous Topic:	mingw/gdb troubles
Next Topic:	Ideas on U++ as library

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Wed May 15 04:14:50 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02670 seconds