|
|
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? [message #46708 is a reply to message #46706] |
Sat, 16 July 2016 21:15 |
|
kov_serg
Messages: 37 Registered: August 2008 Location: Russia
|
Member |
|
|
I rebuild from source last stable version (9251) and disable upgrade. Now it works with out C++11.
And upgrade window should have button select all. Checking thousands of comboboxes is masochism.
I've found the black date it is 22 Feb 2016 ( https://github.com/ultimatepp/mirror/commit/84ed89f483818832 c9811ceaafefd79f7d2ce665 )
+#ifndef CPP_11
+#error This version of U++ REQUIRED C++11
+#endif
My opinios transition into C++11 is a big strategic mistake. Until there is no modules there is no worthwhile reason to use it.
New features will couse even more problems in furute. Also it ruins backward compatibility with old machines. Old versions works even on i486 with windows95 and old suse distros.
For new computers there are a lot of better tools.
ps: all prebuild binaries for ubuntu has problems. I don't know why. But if rebuild from source it works normal.
[Updated on: Sat, 16 July 2016 21:18] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: Novo on Sat, 16 July 2016 17:04
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: Klugier on Sat, 16 July 2016 21:30
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: Klugier on Sat, 16 July 2016 23:37
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mr_ped on Sun, 17 July 2016 12:36
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Thu, 21 July 2016 07:22
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: kov_serg on Sun, 14 August 2016 21:22
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Fri, 02 September 2016 09:24
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: cbpporter on Tue, 06 September 2016 09:04
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mr_ped on Wed, 17 August 2016 10:09
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Wed, 31 August 2016 19:29
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Wed, 31 August 2016 19:34
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Wed, 19 April 2017 15:19
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun May 05 10:58:38 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02150 seconds
|
|
|