U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? [message #46710 is a reply to message #46709]

Sat, 16 July 2016 23:07

kov_serg is currently offline

kov_serg
Messages: 37
Registered: August 2008
Location: Russia

Member

Quote:

I think transient to C++11/C++14 is the only way to keep upp competitive to other C++ frameworks.

Are you joking. "This frame work may work only with C++11 and works stable only on latest compiler and only for this os and only on x64 platform with lates Xeon processors. This make as competitive to others. Others are going to the bright future. So we do."
If it can not find niche it simply dies. In what field it competitive, if you reduce platform where it could run.

Quote:

Keeping old standard only for backwards compatibility is not an option for future of U++.

Everything flows, everything changes but breaking compatibility is the last thing should be done.
Where you benifits for example it it will not run on PentiumD like Windows10?

Quote:

Please notice that several features that is available in newer standards like auto and lambdas allows us to develop U++ faster and easier. It is also good value for framework users code.

I see nothing special in this features. THISBACK works fine.
Are you sure this allow you faster and easier work? It help make dynamyc linking of packages. Increasing gui responsibility?
There is no serious reasons to use labdas except reactive programming.

"Ultimate++ promises radical reduction of code complexity of typical desktop applications" but I see no reduction of code complexity is this. All new features increasing complexity.

In brief: you reduce portability and increase complexity but what you get labda, auto, shorter for. But does not this increase productivity? Or this is only cool useless features like latest iPhone in your pocket.

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: kov_serg on Sat, 16 July 2016 10:37
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: Novo on Sat, 16 July 2016 17:04
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: kov_serg on Sat, 16 July 2016 21:15
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: Klugier on Sat, 16 July 2016 21:30
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: kov_serg on Sat, 16 July 2016 23:07
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: Klugier on Sat, 16 July 2016 23:37
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: mr_ped on Sun, 17 July 2016 12:36
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: mirek on Thu, 21 July 2016 07:22
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: kov_serg on Sun, 14 August 2016 21:22
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: cbpporter on Tue, 16 August 2016 11:18
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: mirek on Fri, 02 September 2016 09:24
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: cbpporter on Tue, 06 September 2016 09:04
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: mr_ped on Wed, 17 August 2016 10:09
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: cbpporter on Fri, 26 August 2016 13:42
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: cbpporter on Tue, 30 August 2016 09:29
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: cbpporter on Tue, 30 August 2016 09:38
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: cbpporter on Tue, 30 August 2016 17:03
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: mirek on Wed, 31 August 2016 19:29
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: mirek on Wed, 31 August 2016 19:34
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: aftershock on Tue, 18 April 2017 21:45
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: mirek on Wed, 19 April 2017 15:19
		Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? By: aftershock on Wed, 19 April 2017 17:15

Previous Topic:	Use zlib inside another library
Next Topic:	U++ in a computer cluster

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Sun May 05 21:20:11 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01377 seconds