U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Possible solution of "icpp problem"

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem" [message #46856 is a reply to message #46854]

Sun, 28 August 2016 20:37

dolik.rce is currently offline

dolik.rce
Messages: 1789
Registered: August 2008
Location: Czech Republic

Ultimate Contributor

dolik.rce@gmail.com

mirek wrote on Sun, 28 August 2016 17:49

Well, first of all, let us not to forget that the problem we really need to have solved is to force linker to include some .obj files from .lib (or .o from .a ... even if none of symbols is referenced from the rest of the code. What I am proposing is basically putting a dummy call from header to such .obj, just to have it 'activated'.

For me the issue always was "there is something non-standard that must be done when compiling/linking". If a static dummy object everything that needs to be done to turn this into "everything works with fine with all common C++ build systems" situation, than it will make me really happy Smile

Smile

If the code stays as simple as you suggested, you could easily hide it into pair of simple macros. That way, user can just add one line to a file that would previously be .icpp and another line to header or anywhere else to force correct linking. It would be handy, for example in the Skylark case I already mentioned.

Honza

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		Possible solution of "icpp problem" By: mirek on Sat, 27 August 2016 16:09
		Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem" By: Mindtraveller on Sun, 28 August 2016 10:07
		Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem" By: dolik.rce on Sun, 28 August 2016 13:57
		Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem" By: mirek on Sun, 28 August 2016 17:49
		Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem" By: Mindtraveller on Sun, 28 August 2016 17:57
		Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem" By: dolik.rce on Sun, 28 August 2016 20:37
		Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem" By: koldo on Mon, 29 August 2016 09:18
		Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem" By: mirek on Thu, 15 September 2016 09:14
		Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem" By: mirek on Sun, 28 August 2016 17:41
		Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem" By: kov_serg on Thu, 22 September 2016 16:44
		Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem" By: mirek on Thu, 22 September 2016 17:02
		Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem" By: kov_serg on Fri, 23 September 2016 00:32
		Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem" By: mirek on Fri, 23 September 2016 09:26
		Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem" By: mr_ped on Sun, 25 September 2016 04:16
		Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem" By: kov_serg on Mon, 26 September 2016 17:05
		Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem" By: mirek on Mon, 26 September 2016 17:43
		Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem" By: kov_serg on Mon, 26 September 2016 18:35

Previous Topic:	[Solved] Instant Upp crash on char input
Next Topic:	Parser error: Unterminated string

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Sun May 12 06:25:01 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03947 seconds