Home » Community » U++ community news and announcements » U++ 2017 beta
| Re: U++ 2017 beta [message #47176 is a reply to message #47151] |
Sun, 25 December 2016 12:18   |
cbpporter
Messages: 1401
Registered: September 2007
|
Ultimate Contributor |
|
|
mirek wrote on Thu, 22 December 2016 10:25It is that time again... Took longer than expected as this ended as the most radical change to U++ in years.
http://www.ultimatepp.org/www$uppweb$Roadmap$en-us.html
Consider the current nightly build a beta. Only serious bugs will be fixed until the release (planned Jan 2).
Mirek
Hi!
And Merry Christmas to you all!
I'm almost back from my hiatus with U++ projects (other urgent tasks came up) and I'm ready for another year of using U++.
But I swear, I won't touch TheIDE ever again if that blasted scroll wheel/loose focus/gain focus bug is not fixed! 
Been complaining about if for at least 5 years. I know, I know, shame on me for not fixing it myself.
Other that that, I gave the beta a whirl on a fresh system. First, I tested without MSC to see if the toolchain package is any good. There is still the issue of 5-10 minute wait for TheIDE to finish search for compilers, only to return with nothing but GCC. I don't know why the registry approach was abandoned. I know it can be finicky and it never worked for some users, but 5 minute wait is too much. But I'm having no problems using registry in my own IDE. I even have the problem that it picked up the ancient MSC8 and naturally nothing won't compile on that.
UWord compiled just fine, but GCC debugged crashed as soon as I hit F5. It works well though for command line apps.
Output mode/target file override is still stored locally in the upp folder and applied to new packages. This makes creating a new package a guaranteed error because it will overwrite a binary from another package. Plus it makes it fiddly to move packages between machines because the path must be set up on each one. This option should be stored in the package and kept isolated form other packages.
Other than that, and the fact that at least 6 classes are forked by me, 2 with bugfixes, the entire project suite compiled and works without a hitch.
Our plan is to use 2017.1 and nighlys exclusively for 2017, so no more backwards compatibility and C++1x issues.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Thu, 22 December 2016 09:25 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: MrSarup on Thu, 22 December 2016 20:25 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Thu, 22 December 2016 23:00 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 08:02 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: Klugier on Sun, 25 December 2016 21:29 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: omari on Mon, 26 December 2016 13:36 |
|
 |
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mr_ped on Fri, 23 December 2016 04:02 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: koldo on Fri, 23 December 2016 10:28 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 09:23 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 09:52 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Sun, 25 December 2016 10:02 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Sun, 25 December 2016 09:52 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 11:24 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
|
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Sun, 01 January 2017 21:51 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
|
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: MrSarup on Wed, 28 December 2016 13:31 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Wed, 28 December 2016 16:53 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
|
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: MrSarup on Wed, 28 December 2016 20:53 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
|
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: Klugier on Wed, 28 December 2016 23:15 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: amrein on Thu, 29 December 2016 08:44 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Sun, 01 January 2017 21:54 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Sun, 01 January 2017 22:03 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: MrSarup on Mon, 02 January 2017 06:09 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Mon, 02 January 2017 22:31 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Mon, 02 January 2017 21:42 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
|
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: amrein on Tue, 03 January 2017 14:22 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Tue, 03 January 2017 14:59 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: amrein on Wed, 04 January 2017 01:04 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: MrSarup on Wed, 04 January 2017 07:28 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 07:59 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 08:03 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
|
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: MrSarup on Wed, 04 January 2017 08:47 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: MrSarup on Wed, 04 January 2017 09:00 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
|
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 10:28 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
|
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: Tom1 on Wed, 04 January 2017 12:32 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 12:38 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: Tom1 on Wed, 04 January 2017 13:20 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
|
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 14:39 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: Tom1 on Wed, 04 January 2017 15:29 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Thu, 05 January 2017 08:38 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: Tom1 on Thu, 05 January 2017 09:17 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 14:49 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
|
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 15:47 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: Klugier on Wed, 04 January 2017 22:32 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Thu, 05 January 2017 08:23 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mr_ped on Thu, 05 January 2017 05:01 |
|
|
Re: U++ 2017 beta
By: mirek on Thu, 05 January 2017 08:20 |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue May 07 22:06:25 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03592 seconds
|
Members
Pages
Help
Register
Login
Home
