U++ Forum - RDF feed
type: channel
description: Main place for discussions about U++ cross platform development framework.
items: Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
items: Re: Unix Domain Sockets Support Added to U++.
items: Re: theide Compilation Error - UPP ver 18167
items: DragAndDrop doesn't work on Fedora 42
items: Unix Domain Sockets Support Added to U++.
items: theide Compilation Error - UPP ver 18167
items: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?

Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: Hi Mirek, OK, now I have something to show. The attached file includes all the code changes required for compiling TheIDE on Windows 11 on ARM64. - The prior scripts for creating the different versions of openssl library should be used to create the required binaries. - The SDL2, MySQL and Postgresql are not currently supported on arm64. - MSVS2026 (community) support has been added to Automatic build methods setup. This includes x86, x64 and arm64. - Automatic build methods setup now also supports setting up clang-mingw for compiling on arm64. - A slight change in library locations for openssl: bin/openssl/x86 bin/openssl/x64 bin/openssl/arm64 - And the same for llvm library too: bin/llvm/x86 bin/llvm/x64 bin/llvm/arm64 (These library location changes are needed for cross platform functionality. We can compile at least on ARM64 for all three architectures now. Possibly the other way around too... I hope.) - Various other tunings have been done to get this work. It is also worth noting, that a slightly wider installation of clang-mingw is needed in order to support arm64 (aarch64). This is easily obtained from the source you already pointed out. As a reference test, I compiled examples/UWord for all three architectures on Windows 11 ARM using both clang-mingw and MSVS2026. NOTE: Unfortunately, while debugger related stuff compiles already and registers are defined, I could not make it work with ARM64. Please take a look and test... I surely would not mind if the debugger issue was solved. Best regards, Tom [EDIT] Now there's MSBT2026 support included too.
creator: Tom1
date: 2025-12-15T20:37:32-00:00

Re: Unix Domain Sockets Support Added to U++.
type: item
description: Hi İsmail, Thanks! I will, when I get some time to focus on it... Best regards, Tom
creator: Tom1
date: 2025-12-15T18:37:11-00:00

Re: theide Compilation Error - UPP ver 18167
type: item
description: Hi Mirek, I could not chack this for couple of weeks. I downloaded version 18235. I am getting following errors In file included from ./uppsrc/Core/Core.h:313, from ./uppsrc/Esc/Esc.h:4, from ./uppsrc/ide/Core/Core.h:4, from ./uppsrc/ide/Builders/Builders.h:4, from ./uppsrc/umk/umake.h:4, from ./uppsrc/umk/Export.cpp:1: ./uppsrc/Core/SIMD_NEON.h: In function 'bool Upp::AllTrue(i16x8)': ./uppsrc/Core/SIMD_NEON.h:135:71: note: use '-flax-vector-conversions' to permit conversions between vectors with differing element types or numbers of subparts 135 | force_inline bool AllTrue(i16x8 a) { return cmask16__(a.data) == cmask_all__; } | ~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~ ./uppsrc/Core/SIMD_NEON.h:135:74: error: cannot convert 'Upp::int16x8_t' to 'Upp::uint16x8_t' 135 | force_inline bool AllTrue(i16x8 a) { return cmask16__(a.data) == cmask_all__; } | ~~^~~~ | | | Upp::int16x8_t ./uppsrc/Core/SIMD_NEON.h:6:29: note: initializing argument 1 of 'Upp::uint64 Upp::cmask16__(uint16x8_t)' 6 | uint64 cmask16__(uint16x8_t mask) { | ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~ ./uppsrc/Core/SIMD_NEON.h: In function 'bool Upp::AnyTrue(i16x8)': ./uppsrc/Core/SIMD_NEON.h:136:74: error: cannot convert 'Upp::int16x8_t' to 'Upp::uint16x8_t' 136 | force_inline bool AnyTrue(i16x8 a) { return cmask16__(a.data); } | ~~^~~~ | | | Upp::int16x8_t ./uppsrc/Core/SIMD_NEON.h:6:29: note: initializing argument 1 of 'Upp::uint64 Upp::cmask16__(uint16x8_t)' 6 | uint64 cmask16__(uint16x8_t mask) { | ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~ ./uppsrc/Core/SIMD_NEON.h: In function 'int Upp::CountTrue(i16x8)': ./uppsrc/Core/SIMD_NEON.h:137:86: error: cannot convert 'Upp::int16x8_t' to 'Upp::uint16x8_t' 137 | force_inline int CountTrue(i16x8 a) { return CountBits64(cmask16__(a.data)) &gt;&gt; 3; } | ~~^~~~ | | | Upp::int16x8_t ./uppsrc/Core/SIMD_NEON.h:6:29: note: initializing argument 1 of 'Upp::uint64 Upp::cmask16__(uint16x8_t)' 6 | uint64 cmask16__(uint16x8_t mask) { | ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~ ./uppsrc/Core/SIMD_NEON.h: In function 'int Upp::FirstTrue(i16x8)': ./uppsrc/Core/SIMD_NEON.…
creator: deep
date: 2025-12-14T05:30:42-00:00

Re: Unix Domain Sockets Support Added to U++.
type: item
description: Hi Tom, I've opened a PR, you can check the code there when you have time. Best regards, İsmail
creator: Oblivion
date: 2025-12-13T21:49:21-00:00

Re: Unix Domain Sockets Support Added to U++.
type: item
description: Oblivion wrote on Sat, 13 December 2025 21:27 A simple test, and good news: It works on Windows too (with a couple of minor modifications on the impl.). I'll have it ready ASAP and then open a PR... Best regards, İsmail Excellent, well done! I had a little chat with copilot and it confirmed (or rather suggested) that AF_UNIX sockets should be as fast as named pipes on both systems, but have better security. Also, they should easily beat local host loopback sockets in performance. Thanks and best regards, Tom
creator: Tom1
date: 2025-12-13T19:43:18-00:00

Re: Unix Domain Sockets Support Added to U++.
type: item
description: A simple test, and good news: It works on Windows too (with a couple of minor modifications on the impl.). I'll have it ready ASAP and then open a PR... Best regards, İsmail
creator: Oblivion
date: 2025-12-13T19:27:33-00:00

Re: Unix Domain Sockets Support Added to U++.
type: item
description: Hello Tom, Quote: Thanks for the news! I was pleased to read about this interesting and important piece of work. As I currently do not have much time to dig into your implementation properly, can you tell me if you included support for Windows 10/11 too? Windows is supposed to support AF_UNIX since about 2017... although not abstract socket namespace. I actually wasn't aware of that until you mentioned it I've been working almost exclusively on Linux for years, so I must have missed that development. That said, since the Socket class already abstracts things in a fairly portable way, and only connection creation and listening need to be handled separately, it should be quite straightforward to add Windows support as well. At the moment, it is available only on POSIX systems I'll check and verify this as soon as possible. Regarding performance, I didn't include any dedicated benchmarks. The U++ nightlies already contain UnixSocketClient and UnixSocketServer examples, which are essentially the same as the SocketClient and SocketServer examples. Based on my experience (outside of U++), Unix domain sockets are generally faster for local IPC, as they avoid the TCP/IP stack overhead. Moreover, performance was not the only motivation. Many system services (such as the notorious D-Bus) rely exclusively on Unix domain sockets. In any case, I'll follow up with some benchmarks. Best regards, İsmail
creator: Oblivion
date: 2025-12-13T16:56:48-00:00

Re: Unix Domain Sockets Support Added to U++.
type: item
description: Hi İsmail, Thanks for the news! I was pleased to read about this interesting and important piece of work. As I currently do not have much time to dig into your implementation properly, can you tell me if you included support for Windows 10/11 too? Windows is supposed to support AF_UNIX since about 2017... although not abstract socket namespace. Do you have any Client/Server sample code that demonstrates and possibly benchmarks the IPC between them? It would be interesting to see how localhost loopback (AF_INET) compares with this. Best regards, Tom
creator: Tom1
date: 2025-12-13T14:50:55-00:00

DragAndDrop doesn't work on Fedora 42
type: item
description: Hello, I just noticed that DragAndDrop of files doesn't work properly on fedora 42. I don't know since when this bug is around, I haven't used this since some time. The reference/DropFiles example has the same symptoms. The behaviour is the following: * try to dragAndDrop A file : It may work or not If it works, the second time you dragAndDrop the same file and the next ones fail (mouse cursor is a stop sign) * If you try to dragAndDrop another file it may work or not * After some point that is reached after 0, 1 or 2 successful DragAndDrop it seems to be stuck in FAIL state I tried to investigate but nothing obvious popped I am on linux Fedora 42 with KDE. The drop source navigator is Dolphin
creator: Didier
date: 2025-12-11T22:51:45-00:00

Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: mirek wrote on Tue, 09 December 2025 09:08 Tom1 wrote on Mon, 08 December 2025 23:10 I hope this makes it easier to update openssl. Unfortunately we still to support MSVC... Maybe this helps... based it on MSBT22 tool chain and Strawberry Perl. Those installed, it should do the job. (At least it works here.) The libs for all architectures can be found in the source dir/dist/lib/<arch>. Best regards, Tom
creator: Tom1
date: 2025-12-09T23:28:33-00:00

Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: mirek wrote on Tue, 09 December 2025 09:15 Tom1 wrote on Mon, 08 December 2025 23:50 Hi, Still in trouble with commenting out debugger. Any suggestions on how to do that cleanly and efficiently? IDK, I guess the best option is to fix it I guess he is unhappy about CPU registers... Quote: Another issue that surfaced is libclang which is missing too. How to build or is it available readily in some location? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases You install win arm64 and fetch libclang.dll from files... Thanks Mirek, libclang.lib, libclang.dll, etc. can be found just there. I managed to block all calls to debugger parts and comment them somewhat out and TheIDE even started natively. Of course as that was a quick and dirty test only, I reverted to the original and started to figure out the Debugger. Yes, the debugger battle starts with registers. The cvconst.h file is missing ARM64 registers, but they can be found in: https://github.com/microsoft/microsoft-pdb/blob/master/inclu de/cvconst.h Actually, the above file is MIT licensed, so could that possibly be used instead of the original (LGPL)? Don't know about the other consequences though... The registers are different and Context needs ARM64_NT_CONTEXT in place of CONTEXT. Next, a arm64.cpu needs to be created, but that's not straight forward. After this everything gets dark... there are a lot of #ifdef s around the code and we should add a whole bunch more to have it go the ARM64 way. But I need better understanding about the Debugger and ARM64 registers to figure out how everything is supposed to be dealt with. I will return if I get something useful done here. Currently I'm not so sure I will get anywhere with this... Best regards, Tom
creator: Tom1
date: 2025-12-09T16:55:01-00:00

Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: Tom1 wrote on Mon, 08 December 2025 23:50 Hi, Still in trouble with commenting out debugger. Any suggestions on how to do that cleanly and efficiently? IDK, I guess the best option is to fix it I guess he is unhappy about CPU registers... Quote: Another issue that surfaced is libclang which is missing too. How to build or is it available readily in some location? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases You install win arm64 and fetch libclang.dll from files...
creator: mirek
date: 2025-12-09T07:15:14-00:00

Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: Tom1 wrote on Mon, 08 December 2025 23:10 I hope this makes it easier to update openssl. Unfortunately we still to support MSVC...
creator: mirek
date: 2025-12-09T07:08:20-00:00

Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: Hi, Still in trouble with commenting out debugger. Any suggestions on how to do that cleanly and efficiently? Another issue that surfaced is libclang which is missing too. How to build or is it available readily in some location? I think I need some #define that tells in package manager and code about ARM64 architecture so that parts can be included and excluded depending on that. Windows + ARM seems a bit different than just plain old Windows... Best regards, Tom
creator: Tom1
date: 2025-12-08T22:50:38-00:00

Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: Hi, I composed a new way to build openssl static libraries for Windows (x86, x86_64 and arm64), using CLANG (mingw-llvm) cross compilation on Linux Mint. This might even work on other Ubuntu based distros... There are two scripts, one for downloading and preparing the required tools and downloading the sources for openssl. The second is for building the static libraries *.a for all three architectures. USAGE: Just copy the scripts to your home directory and first run the preparing script once and then the build script once -- or until you get working results. (It is possible that further dependencies might be missing from the preparing script, so let me know if this is the case.) The builder script creates an openssl folder in your home directory that contains only the headers and the static libraries for each architecture. I hope this makes it easier to update openssl. Please test. Best regards, Tom
creator: Tom1
date: 2025-12-08T22:10:11-00:00

Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: Hi, Quote: Maybe, but if, then it requires more wisdom than I can offer... OK, I deserved that! BTW: I just noticed that I do not seem to get email notifications about new messages here as I used to. The Post Notification switch is still enabled just as before... I will try to dig into openssl compilation challenge, but can't make any promises. Best regards, Tom
creator: Tom1
date: 2025-12-08T13:19:23-00:00

Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: Tom1 wrote on Sun, 07 December 2025 14:07 Hi Mirek, It seems that stripping out the debugger is not quite straight forward... There are a lot of connection points for various parts. BTW: How does debugger work on new Apple hardware, or is that even comparable to ARM64 in any sense? It is supposed to work in the same way as on Rapsberry PI - it is posix environment, so GDB is used as (poor) debugger backend. Supposed, as to have working gdb on MacOS is not exactly easy, so there is no debugger in theide on MacOS at this time. Quote: Also, openssl compilation seems to require more wisdom that I can offer at this time. Just wondering, if openssl could be converted into a package to make it compile along with the rest of the packages? Maybe, but if, then it requires more wisdom than I can offer...
creator: mirek
date: 2025-12-07T17:52:44-00:00

Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: Hi Mirek, It seems that stripping out the debugger is not quite straight forward... There are a lot of connection points for various parts. BTW: How does debugger work on new Apple hardware, or is that even comparable to ARM64 in any sense? Also, openssl compilation seems to require more wisdom that I can offer at this time. Just wondering, if openssl could be converted into a package to make it compile along with the rest of the packages? The third issue is that some external hardware related binary dependencies I have with my software are not (yet) available for ARM64 architecture, so that will definitely cause significant delays for migration. To summarize, the rest of the world is not there yet, but I'm pleased to see that we can indeed compile and run some U++ based programs natively already. Best regards, Tom
creator: Tom1
date: 2025-12-07T13:07:43-00:00

Unix Domain Sockets Support Added to U++.
type: item
description: Hi, Unix Domain Sockets Support Added to U++. The socket API (renamed to Upp::Socket) now fully supports Unix domain sockets on POSIX systems, including both filesystem-based sockets and (on Linux) abstract namespace sockets. New methods: - ConnectFileSystem / ListenFileSystem: POSIX-wide, bind/connect using a regular filesystem path. - ConnectAbstract / ListenAbstract: Linux-only, using the abstract namespace (no filesystem entry). This should make local IPC faster, cleaner, and more flexible across platforms. Feedback and testing are welcome! Best regards, Oblivion
creator: Oblivion
date: 2025-12-06T13:11:03-00:00

Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: Yes, that is sort of expected... Anyway, you can #ifdef debugger out, but you will still have a problem with openssl... Here are my notes about how to compile openssl: https://github.com/ultimatepp/ultimatepp/blob/master/uppbox/ Scripts/updateinfo.txt I think it should basically work for ARM too. Maybe with some additional adjustments.
creator: mirek
date: 2025-12-05T12:18:09-00:00

Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: Now tried to "Setup > Upgrade TheIDE" in order to get native TheIDE if that has any effect for debugging. However, I was unable to compile it: Saving ----- ide/Common ( GUI CLANG BLITZ WIN32 ) (1 / 40) BLITZ: ComDlg.cpp Module.cpp Util.cpp ----- ide/Core ( GUI CLANG BLITZ WIN32 ) (2 / 40) BLITZ: Ide.cpp Cache.cpp Core.cpp Util.cpp Builder.cpp PPinfo.cpp Assembly.cpp Package.cpp Workspace.cpp usc.cpp BinObj.cpp Signature.cpp Host .cpp Logger.cpp ----- ide/LayDes ( GUI CLANG BLITZ WIN32 ) (3 / 40) BLITZ: sdiff.cpp laylib.cpp layusc.cpp property.cpp textprop.cpp fontprop.cpp propane.cpp item.cpp layout.cpp visgen.cpp laydes.cpp layfile.cp p laywin.cpp ----- ide/Builders ( GUI CLANG WIN32 ) (4 / 40) Precompiling header: Builders.h ide/Common: 3 file(s) built in (0:01.51), 505 msecs / file ide/Core: 14 file(s) built in (0:02.48), 177 msecs / file ide/LayDes: 13 file(s) built in (0:03.67), 282 msecs / file CppBuilder.cpp MakeFile.cpp CCJ.cpp GccBuilder.cpp MscBuilder.cpp JavaBuilder.cpp ScriptBuilder.cpp Cocoa.cpp AndroidProject.cpp AndroidApplicationMakeFile.cpp AndroidMakeFile.cpp AndroidModuleMakeFile.cpp AndroidBuilder.cpp AndroidBuilderCommands.cpp AndroidBuilderUtils.cpp AndroidModuleMakeFileBuilder.cpp Blitz.cpp Build.cpp Install.cpp BuilderUtils.cpp ide/Builders: 21 file(s) built in (0:07.57), 360 msecs / file Creating library... C:/upp/bin/clang/bin/llvm-ar.exe: warning: creating C:/upp/out/uppsrc/ide/Builders/CLANGARM64.Gui\Builders.a C:/upp/out/uppsrc/ide/Builders/CLANGARM64.Gui\Builders.a (1124408 B) created in (0:00.07) ----- ide/Debuggers ( GUI CLANG BLITZ WIN32 ) (5 / 40) BLITZ: Terminal.cpp Disas.cpp GdbCmd.cpp GdbData.cpp Gdb.cpp GdbMem.cpp GdbUtils.cpp Debug.cpp Mem.cpp Sym.cpp Exp.cpp PrettyUpp.cpp PrettyStd .cpp Scripts.cpp Pretty.cpp Visualise.cpp Data.cpp Tree.cpp Stack.cpp Code.cpp Cpu.cpp Pdb.cpp ----- ide/Browser ( GUI CLANG BLITZ WIN32 ) (6 / 40) BLITZ: Util.cpp TopicBase.cpp File.cpp Topic.cpp Template.cpp Link.cpp TopicWin.cpp Move.cpp CodeRef.…
creator: Tom1
date: 2025-12-05T11:38:24-00:00

Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: Hi, Quote: Slightly off topic, you do know about "Misc/Copy current position" ? I have no idea what this is... should I?? Quote: I guess there 2 hard problems ahead: - libraries that we ship with (esp OpenSSL). that is even more sad as updating libraries takes awful amount of time, now there would be another architecture... - debugging. That might possibly work (test please), but at minimum the dissassembler only supports x86. - I agree, libraries cause a constantly increasing amount of work and adding another architecture is again a multiplier to this work. - Debugging does not work here. Tried to run UWord in debugger and TheIDE reported: "Error! SetThreadContext failed. The thread context could not be updated because this has been restricted for the process. (1660)" Best regards, Tom
creator: Tom1
date: 2025-12-05T11:34:05-00:00

Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: Tom1 wrote on Fri, 05 December 2025 10:53 Hi Mirek, OK, now I have the new laptop with Windows 11 ARM64 up and running. The nightly upp installed easily and runs in the Prism emulation (embedded in Windows 11 ARM by default) very well and does not feel sluggish at all. The next step I took was downloading ARM64 version of the llvm tools from: https://github.com/mstorsjo/llvm-mingw/releases/download/202 51202/llvm-mingw-20251202-ucrt-aarch64.zip Then I extracted the contents and replaced the entire C:\upp\bin\clang -directory with the contents from this archive. I opened theide and the UWord from examples. As I tried to compile it, the compiler first complained about the 'Common option -mpopcnt' which is not supported by aarch64. So I removed that option. I also changed the PATH executable directory: C:\upp\bin\clang\x86_64-w64-mingw32\bin path to point at C:\upp\bin\clang\aarch64-w64-mingw32\bin instead. I made those changes to a new build method 'CLANGARM64' using 'CLANG' builder. I know this is not complete and probably needs more changes for at least the other paths, includes and libraries, depending on the program being built. Next issue was found on Core\Debug.cpp around line 270. Slightly off topic, you do know about "Misc/Copy current position" ? Quote: The 'qword esp = ep->ContextRecord->Rsp;' and 'dword esp = ep->ContextRecord->Esp;' do not exist here. I do not know how to really fix this, but as a quick and dirty workaround I decided to replace that code with just 'qword esp = 0;' and consequently the UWord compiled, linked and runs OK! That whole thing can go away I guess, it is fossil... Quote: So, I guess all this is doable, but requires some tuning in TheIDE so that everything runs natively out of the box. Can you take a more professional look at this based on this description? I guess there 2 hard problems ahead: - libraries that we ship with (esp OpenSSL). that is even more sad as updating libraries takes awful amount of time, now there would be anot…
creator: mirek
date: 2025-12-05T10:06:11-00:00

Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: Hi Mirek, OK, now I have the new laptop with Windows 11 ARM64 up and running. The nightly upp installed easily and runs in the Prism emulation (embedded in Windows 11 ARM by default) very well and does not feel sluggish at all. The next step I took was downloading ARM64 version of the llvm tools from: https://github.com/mstorsjo/llvm-mingw/releases/download/202 51202/llvm-mingw-20251202-ucrt-aarch64.zip Then I extracted the contents and replaced the entire C:\upp\bin\clang -directory with the contents from this archive. I opened theide and the UWord from examples. As I tried to compile it, the compiler first complained about the 'Common option -mpopcnt' which is not supported by aarch64. So I removed that option. I also changed the PATH executable directory: C:\upp\bin\clang\x86_64-w64-mingw32\bin path to point at C:\upp\bin\clang\aarch64-w64-mingw32\bin instead. I made those changes to a new build method 'CLANGARM64' using 'CLANG' builder. I know this is not complete and probably needs more changes for at least the other paths, includes and libraries, depending on the program being built. Next issue was found on Core\Debug.cpp around line 270. The 'qword esp = ep->ContextRecord->Rsp;' and 'dword esp = ep->ContextRecord->Esp;' do not exist here. I do not know how to really fix this, but as a quick and dirty workaround I decided to replace that code with just 'qword esp = 0;' and consequently the UWord compiled, linked and runs OK! So, I guess all this is doable, but requires some tuning in TheIDE so that everything runs natively out of the box. Can you take a more professional look at this based on this description? Best regards, Tom
creator: Tom1
date: 2025-12-05T09:53:55-00:00

Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: Tom1 wrote on Sun, 30 November 2025 16:18 Hi, I discovered a nice black friday deal and finally decided to order a laptop with snapdragon and Windows 11 ARM. Any suggestions on how to get Ultimate++ up and running natively on this platform? I guess I will get the laptop in just a few days... Best regards, Tom From what I know, and I might be wrong, start with running U++ non-natively. Then fiddle with compiler/build methods. https://github.com/mstorsjo/llvm-mingw which we use supports ARM (but I tend to delete it from the archive for now). IMO, over speaking should not be all that hard. Keep us updated, this is interesting. Mirek
creator: mirek
date: 2025-11-30T19:18:40-00:00

Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: Hi, I discovered a nice black friday deal and finally decided to order a laptop with snapdragon and Windows 11 ARM. Any suggestions on how to get Ultimate++ up and running natively on this platform? I guess I will get the laptop in just a few days... Best regards, Tom
creator: Tom1
date: 2025-11-30T15:18:30-00:00

Re: theide Compilation Error - UPP ver 18167
type: item
description: OK. Please try to add force_inline uint64 cmask16__(uint16x8_t mask) { return vreinterpretq_s16_u16(mask); } at the start of SIMD_NEON.h If it fixes the compilation and you have theide working, please run autotest/SIMD_CMP test (should end with OK). Also autotest/SIMD and autotest/SIMD2 just to be sure all is with NEON...
creator: mirek
date: 2025-11-27T06:14:19-00:00

Re: theide Compilation Error - UPP ver 18167
type: item
description: Nvidia DGX spark. With DGX OS
creator: deep
date: 2025-11-27T04:24:07-00:00

Re: theide Compilation Error - UPP ver 18167
type: item
description: deep wrote on Sat, 22 November 2025 10:05 My Hardware Which one exactly?
creator: mirek
date: 2025-11-24T07:59:59-00:00

theide Compilation Error - UPP ver 18167
type: item
description: My Hardware Processor ARM cores While compiling theide with ./install command I get following error in ./uppsrc/Core/SIMD_NEON.h file /uppsrc/Core/SIMD_NEON.h: In function 'int Upp::CountTrue(i16x8)': ./uppsrc/Core/SIMD_NEON.h:135:86: error: cannot convert 'Upp::int16x8_t' to 'Upp::uint16x8_t' 135 | force_inline int CountTrue(i16x8 a) { return CountBits64(cmask16__(a.data)) >> 3; } ./uppsrc/Core/SIMD_NEON.h:248:41: note: initializing argument 1 of 'Upp::uint64 Upp::cmask8__(uint8x16_t)' 248 | force_inline uint64 cmask8__(uint8x16_t mask) { return cmask16__(vreinterpretq_u16_u8(mask)); } ./uppsrc/Core/SIMD_NEON.h:190:42: note: initializing argument 1 of 'Upp::uint64 Upp::cmask32__(uint32x4_t)' 190 | force_inline uint64 cmask32__(uint32x4_t mask) { return cmask16__(vreinterpretq_u16_u32(mask)); }
creator: deep
date: 2025-11-22T09:05:58-00:00

Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: Tom1 wrote on Tue, 04 February 2025 12:09 Thanks Mirek, I guess this support will need to be sorted out within a couple of years, i.e. just before clients start to wonder why our apps do not install/run on their brand new Windows laptops. Visual Studio 2022 (x64) can target ARM64 too, so could we be lucky enough to have it working by just adding a suitable BM? Yes. CLANG Toolchain we use even supports it already...
creator: mirek
date: 2025-02-04T11:44:34-00:00

Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: Thanks Mirek, I guess this support will need to be sorted out within a couple of years, i.e. just before clients start to wonder why our apps do not install/run on their brand new Windows laptops. Visual Studio 2022 (x64) can target ARM64 too, so could we be lucky enough to have it working by just adding a suitable BM? Anyway, I do not have such a laptop, so I will not be able to test this yet. Best regards, Tom EDIT: OK, they may run in emulation, but I mean natively...
creator: Tom1
date: 2025-02-04T11:09:25-00:00

Re: Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: Tom1 wrote on Thu, 09 January 2025 10:38 Hi, I noticed that new Windows laptops have appeared on the market with ARM64 architecture processors (e.g. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100). Is U++ ready for this? Tom No. But it will probably not be an issue. CLANG-MINGW seems to support these for a long time. And ARM is not a problem - we run on MacOS M1 and Rapsberry PI without issue. Also windows emulate x86.
creator: mirek
date: 2025-02-04T07:35:10-00:00

Do we have support for Windows on ARM64?
type: item
description: Hi, I noticed that new Windows laptops have appeared on the market with ARM64 architecture processors (e.g. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100). Is U++ ready for this? Best regards, Tom
creator: Tom1
date: 2025-01-09T09:38:04-00:00