U++ framework
Do not panic. Ask here before giving up.
Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » Suggest Xmlize support for Value
Re: Suggest Xmlize support for Value [message #16134 is a reply to message #16123] Wed, 28 May 2008 21:51 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Mindtraveller is currently offline  Mindtraveller
Messages: 917
Registered: August 2007
Location: Russia, Moscow rgn.
Experienced Contributor
Because it handles with hierarchical config data very conveniently. You should not write your own binary containers. Moreover, data could be partially binary and partially textual. I heavily use this feature i.e. for saving library of objects with dynamic properties. This means I don`t know types of each property at compile time, as user may add properties of any common type. This looks like rather common task and Xmlize works great for this (I even stopped writing my own XmlProperties class when implemented Value support for Xmlize).

Binding to binary format looks like a serious problem. But do we really do it? What we do is writing the same data output we have for all the types but in "textual" format. We could have the same output on all the platforms. The same bytes. My method simply emulates reading binary bytes. The same bytes you would read by using "direct" method. This is as far as I understand, maybe it`s not that simple though.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Upp::Time::Get() missing const
Next Topic: Can we get a Join that uses WString?
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Aug 01 10:17:51 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00843 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.2.0.
Copyright ©2001-2025 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software