U++ framework: U++ Core » Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types [message #17105 is a reply to message #17104]

Tue, 29 July 2008 10:52

mr_ped
Messages: 826
Registered: November 2005
Location: Czech Republic - Praha

Experienced Contributor

At( index, init_value );

edit:
BTW, I like current behavior.
The uninitialized memory bugs don't happen to me anymore (unit testing + valgrind), and for performance reasons the current behavior of At is better for me.

[Updated on: Tue, 29 July 2008 10:57]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: cbpporter on Tue, 29 July 2008 10:51
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: mr_ped on Tue, 29 July 2008 10:52
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: cbpporter on Tue, 29 July 2008 11:10
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: mr_ped on Tue, 29 July 2008 11:13
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: cbpporter on Tue, 29 July 2008 11:20
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: mirek on Tue, 29 July 2008 11:24
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: cbpporter on Tue, 29 July 2008 16:03
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: mirek on Tue, 29 July 2008 18:39
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: cbpporter on Tue, 29 July 2008 21:55
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: mr_ped on Tue, 29 July 2008 11:22

Previous Topic:	zlib
Next Topic:	Interesting struggle with "Moveable<T>" usage in GCC

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 28 02:46:57 GMT+1 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00678 seconds