|
|
Home » Community » U++ Webs: Functioning, Layout , Design, Features and Structure of these forums, homepage etc. » Ultimate++ Homepage Translations (RU...)
|
|
Re: Ultimate++ Homepage Translations (RU...) [message #25145 is a reply to message #24600] |
Fri, 12 February 2010 16:30   |
|
Hi Koldo!
If there are doubts about modifying the home page, it can be brought up for discussion, or, in the end, nothing prevents us tomorrow or next week to return to the previous version.
My pros and cons:
- I hope that we can change the functional uppweb so that text typed script for more than 24 points in the HTML output would fall as the tag <H1>, and then these titles help us very much in search engine optimization.
- Is the repetition of key words typed with a different style.
Certainly it seems to me quite right to alter design of the main page and include plenty of keywords to go there and remove it from the list of files to download, because, again, for search engine optimization, the main holder of the keywords the site is the home page.
I'd like (for search engine optimization is extremely important) to be able to links and images to include the tag TITLE, which shows a balloon, but the text of the tips is several times more weight than plain text for search engines.
SergeyNikitin<U++>( linux, wine )
{
under( Ubuntu || Debian || Raspbian );
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Ultimate++ Homepage Translations (RU...) [message #25154 is a reply to message #25149] |
Fri, 12 February 2010 21:32   |
|
Sc0rch wrote on Fri, 12 February 2010 21:29 |
luzr wrote on Fri, 12 February 2010 22:14 |
Suggestions welcome.
|
Hello, Mirek!
I think, HelloWorld example link can be placed on the main page (for newbies and maybe for interest of others =)).
Best regards,
Anton
|
Maybe TheIDE + window of Layout Designer and there (in it) design of window of HelloWorld?
SergeyNikitin<U++>( linux, wine )
{
under( Ubuntu || Debian || Raspbian );
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Ultimate++ Homepage Translations (RU...) [message #25257 is a reply to message #25256] |
Mon, 15 February 2010 21:39   |
|
koldo wrote on Mon, 15 February 2010 21:32 | What do you think ?. What location do you prefer ?
|
I would say the best position would be in the header (somewhere above position 3), but there is already google ad.
From the suggested places, I think number 2 is the best.
Best regards,
Honza
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Apr 26 19:28:54 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01576 seconds
|
|
|