Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » NTL and C4251
Re: NTL and C4251 [message #2760 is a reply to message #2759] |
Mon, 24 April 2006 22:44   |
|
luzr wrote on Mon, 24 April 2006 15:29 |
unodgs wrote on Mon, 24 April 2006 13:29 |
jmansion wrote on Mon, 24 April 2006 09:34 |
BTW have you considered working with Walter Bright to use Digital Mars C++ under Win32?
|
I tried to build upp libs with dm c++. Unfortunately even with newset beta it fails to compile main upp lib - core (problems with templates).
Hopefuly Walter is fixing his compiler to be able to compile boost so maybe it will help to compile upp too (main reason I want to use dmc is speed of compilation...)
|
I hope some day we will gather enough resources to resolve this problem forever (I mean, C++ compiler is HARD thing to implement, but that makes it wonderful task to do, does not it? 
Mirek
|
Once I had to write something similar to c compiler (using bison and flex) and it even worked (it produced 16-bit asm output for tasm). I remeber that I spent lots of houres working on it..
Probably it would take you about 3 years to implement full C++ compiler (and once you get it you will have to reimplemnt this to be compatabile with new 0x standard... )
Of course I wish you a luck ! 
PS: Personally I would switch to sth similar to D but without gc and with multiple inheritance (That may seem silly but the worst thing in D for me is that I have to use new syntax to create object..)
|
|
|
 |
|
NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Mon, 24 April 2006 14:26
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Mon, 24 April 2006 15:26
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Mon, 24 April 2006 15:34
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: unodgs on Mon, 24 April 2006 19:29
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Mon, 24 April 2006 21:29
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: unodgs on Mon, 24 April 2006 22:44
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Mon, 24 April 2006 22:49
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:23
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:45
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: unodgs on Tue, 25 April 2006 13:54
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 14:07
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 14:20
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 14:33
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 15:03
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 15:19
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: unodgs on Tue, 25 April 2006 15:43
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 16:06
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 20:10
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Wed, 26 April 2006 10:02
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Wed, 26 April 2006 10:10
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:17
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Mon, 24 April 2006 16:04
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Mon, 24 April 2006 16:27
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 09:45
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:41
|
 |
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:26
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Aug 12 15:14:14 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06549 seconds
|