Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Google Summer of Code
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Google Summer of Code [message #31223 is a reply to message #25695] |
Tue, 15 February 2011 23:16   |
raxvan
Messages: 60 Registered: December 2009
|
Member |
|
|
Hello,
The main purpose of the app is to use the computing power of idle workstations in order to speed up the compiling speed for a project. Usually most of the time, the CPU of a machine is not used 100% therefore when other people need to compile a big project the extra power can speed up this process significantly.
Also another advantage of having such a system is the ability to compile and run on other remote platforms making the development for multiple operating systems much easier. The programmer can use the development environment of his choice and compile for any OS that has a build server running. This will increases productivity many times over just because the developer will use the IDE he is used with (constantly switching between Window and Mac is really a pain).
Having a server with the ability to compile code remotely allows users to create a really powerful build machine keeping the costs of other computers down just because the user has to only run a simple editor. Also, if we take for example the package system of TheIde, the server can dynamically choose already built sources increasing the build speed even further.
The main purpose of the Distributed Build System is to allow programmers to build projects on multiple machines, but this can be extended even further. For example the server can keep track of the source repository, automated nightly buils, or last stable binary files.
Raxvan.
92b48bf94855483bb4cec8bcc8c0c933
|
|
|
|
| Re: Google Summer of Code [message #31267 is a reply to message #31220] |
Thu, 17 February 2011 16:49   |
|
|
Another Idea:
- Name:
Google V8 JavaScript in U++
- Proposed by:
Ion Lupascu
- Difficulty:
Medium
- Experience required:
UPP, V8 JavaScript, JavaScript
- Description:
V8 implements ECMAScript as specified in ECMA-262, 3rd edition, and runs on Windows XP and Vista, Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard), and Linux systems that use IA-32 or ARM processors. In U++ V8 will be a good choise to create possibility for extensions.
- Mentors:
TBD
- Roadmap:
TBD
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Google Summer of Code [message #31303 is a reply to message #31277] |
Sat, 19 February 2011 22:02   |
 |
koldo
Messages: 3458 Registered: August 2008
|
Senior Veteran |
|
|
Hello all
At the same time of IRC meeting, I was talking with Borja, the GSoC administrator for Globus and mentor of OpenNebula. I expect in next days help from a KDE mentor too.
He helped OpenMedula last year and they were accepted, so I think his help will be valuable .
Borja said the most important thing in a project is the ideas list. The level of detail for our list is good, but he says we need more ideas, at least 10.
He also said that ideas list often lead to interesting projects, but (in his experience) the best projects come from students that propose their own projects based on discussions with potential mentors.
So it is a good idea to include a list of mentors including their "skills" to encourage the students to contact with them. This way if they have ideas for a project that are not part of the list provided, they know to whom to contact.
He commented that people often includes ideas too complicated to be resolved in 3 months by a student. In Globus and OpenMedula they call them "blue sky" ideas.
He considered it was a good idea to create the "Tutoring Plan" because Google appreciates that the organization has experience working with students.
In a short summary:
- we have to submit more ideas
- if you want to be a mentor, please join the team and describe your skills in few words
- if you are a student, let us know (we will indicate that the idea comes from a student), an talk with possible mentors to polish the idea.
Best regards
Iñaki
[Updated on: Sun, 20 February 2011 09:24] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Google Summer of Code [message #31306 is a reply to message #31305] |
Sun, 20 February 2011 12:10   |
gprentice
Messages: 260 Registered: November 2005 Location: New Zealand
|
Experienced Member |
|
|
| koldo wrote on Sun, 20 February 2011 21:33 |
Included!
We have now 8 ideas. With a few more we will be more eligible .
|
lol!
I'd like to suggest an extension to Mr Ped idea of the T++ preview. Improve the infrastructure of U++ help in general, maybe using Kohait help viewer. Possibly even create a standalone help package.
1. Structured table of contents in parallel with existing "package reference" help. Anyone can add things or add their own pages locally.
2. Existing topic++ pages can be linked to and links within those pages work whether they're viewed from the "new" help or existing.
3. Provide, history, favorites, bookmarks and retrace.
4. Press F1 in source code and the help window shows help for word under cursor i.e. add a mechanism that supports this.
5. Click on a blue square and you see the topic page in non-edit mode i.e. go straight to Mr Ped "preview mode".
6. Improve the help search so it takes you to the exact line.
7. Add "tag word" mechanism so that tag words can be assigned to a topic++ page and searched for.
For extra credit
1. Generate pdf with table of contents of it all
2. Convert from topic++ format to google docs format and vice versa - maybe.
3. Improve/ automate the mechanism for users to submit changes/ improvements to the help.
Should be plenty of people capable of mentoring this but I'm not one of them...
Sooner or later I'm going to do some of this myself if no-one else does.
Graeme.
[Updated on: Sun, 20 February 2011 12:13] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Google Summer of Code [message #31333 is a reply to message #31324] |
Wed, 23 February 2011 06:07   |
Novo
Messages: 1431 Registered: December 2006
|
Ultimate Contributor |
|
|
| koldo wrote on Mon, 21 February 2011 18:24 |
| Novo wrote on Sun, 20 February 2011 17:43 |
| andreincx wrote on Wed, 09 February 2011 03:35 | - U++ as a library - lib files for simple linkage from other IDE's and dll/so to make it easier to write plugins which use U++.
Andrei
|
How about using application itself as a library? Export required symbols from application and link against it. Theoretically, this should work. 
|
Hello Novo
Could you detail it more . Like to be understood by (a dummy like) me...
|
Applications in ELF and COFF (Unix and Windows) formats are DLLs by them self. By default they do not export any symbols. This situation can be changed by using -E options with gcc linker on Linux (this will export all symbols), using dllexport on Windows (as with regular DLL), or by using a special file, which lists all symbols, which should be exported (this should work at least on Windows).
If I remember correctly, you do not need to do anything else in case of Unix (ELF). By default Unix applications (ELF) are compiled with lazy symbol binding. This means that symbols are resolved at run time only if they are needed. If they are exported from application, they will be resolved.
In case of Windows and old Unix (COFF format) all symbols should be resolved at link time. You will need to link your DLL against your_application.lib. I haven't tried to do this by myself, but I believe this should work. 
Regards,
Novo
|
|
|
|
| Re: Google Summer of Code [message #31334 is a reply to message #31333] |
Wed, 23 February 2011 09:20   |
 |
koldo
Messages: 3458 Registered: August 2008
|
Senior Veteran |
|
|
| Novo wrote on Wed, 23 February 2011 06:07 |
| koldo wrote on Mon, 21 February 2011 18:24 |
| Novo wrote on Sun, 20 February 2011 17:43 |
| andreincx wrote on Wed, 09 February 2011 03:35 | - U++ as a library - lib files for simple linkage from other IDE's and dll/so to make it easier to write plugins which use U++.
Andrei
|
How about using application itself as a library? Export required symbols from application and link against it. Theoretically, this should work. 
|
Hello Novo
Could you detail it more . Like to be understood by (a dummy like) me...
|
Applications in ELF and COFF (Unix and Windows) formats are DLLs by them self. By default they do not export any symbols. This situation can be changed by using -E options with gcc linker on Linux (this will export all symbols), using dllexport on Windows (as with regular DLL), or by using a special file, which lists all symbols, which should be exported (this should work at least on Windows).
If I remember correctly, you do not need to do anything else in case of Unix (ELF). By default Unix applications (ELF) are compiled with lazy symbol binding. This means that symbols are resolved at run time only if they are needed. If they are exported from application, they will be resolved.
In case of Windows and old Unix (COFF format) all symbols should be resolved at link time. You will need to link your DLL against your_application.lib. I haven't tried to do this by myself, but I believe this should work. 
|
Hello Novo
Do you mean, to create a kind of dynamic plugin system?
Best regards
Iñaki
|
|
|
|
| Re: Google Summer of Code [message #31340 is a reply to message #31334] |
Wed, 23 February 2011 15:44   |
Novo
Messages: 1431 Registered: December 2006
|
Ultimate Contributor |
|
|
| koldo wrote on Wed, 23 February 2011 03:20 | Do you mean, to create a kind of dynamic plugin system?
|
Anything, which can be used as extension of UPP. Dynamic plugin system requires support in UPP. Theoretically, packages can be compiled as DLLs and linked in or loaded on demand.
Regards,
Novo
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Google Summer of Code [message #31345 is a reply to message #31342] |
Wed, 23 February 2011 23:55   |
|
|
| koldo wrote on Wed, 23 February 2011 16:34 | Hello Novo
In this recent post mirek said he did not want a dynamic plugin.
|
Hi Koldo,
I think Mirek wanted to say that the plugin architecture you're exposed in that thread can't be used as plugins (dll/so) loadable at runtime. AFAIK Mirek agree to have possibility to use plugins with U++. IMO the only thing that stops that is that U++ can't be compiled (easily?) as dll/so. But if Novo is right, then it should be possible, yet i like more the traditional solution 
Andrei
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Google Summer of Code [message #31364 is a reply to message #31310] |
Fri, 25 February 2011 11:41   |
gprentice
Messages: 260 Registered: November 2005 Location: New Zealand
|
Experienced Member |
|
|
| koldo wrote on Mon, 21 February 2011 05:11 | Hello Graeme
I have added your idea. Please review and complete it, specially the extra credits.
|
Sorry for the delay but due to a catastrophic earthquake here in Christchurch NZ, I've had no power or water for the last 3 days. I'm fine though, unlike a few people.
Regarding the extra credits
1. Converting to PDF - we can do this already, right? I know nothing about it but the table of contents and preferably also the index, need to become a clickable table of contents and a clickable index and also the links need to work - may be a bit of a challenge. Perhaps a project on its own.
2. Convert to google docs format - this was just a wild thought because it's a google thing. Google docs allows simultaneous online changes by multiple users so possibly people could write and maintain an individual help page as a google doc and import as a topic page when convenient. With a proper help infrastructure, people might become more interested in updating the help and the easier it is, the more likely people are to contribute.
3. Automate the mechanism for submitting changes to the help - relating to what I said just above, automate the process so that people are more likely to contribute. How easy are topic++ files to diff? Maybe something for a student to investigate. Maybe Google docs is a solution.
Graeme
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Google Summer of Code [message #31385 is a reply to message #31350] |
Sun, 27 February 2011 06:30   |
Novo
Messages: 1431 Registered: December 2006
|
Ultimate Contributor |
|
|
| koldo wrote on Thu, 24 February 2011 05:00 | Hello Novo
You are right.
Please detail as much as possible, as clear as possible your idea and follow the format here.
|
I've made a small example for Windows.
It works. I'm not sure that this project is a good candidate for GSOC, but it looks like nobody else is using this trick. UPP could be the first.
It is up to the UPP community to decide.
Regards,
Novo
|
|
|
|
| Re: Google Summer of Code [message #31396 is a reply to message #31385] |
Mon, 28 February 2011 15:00   |
|
|
Another Idea:
- Name:
IPC(Inter-process Communication) using named pipes (local host) and socket (network)
- Proposed by:
Ion Lupascu
- Difficulty:
Medium
- Experience required:
UPP, socket, named pipes (POSIX, WINDOWS)
- Description:
Using IPC can create a stable plugin manager with crash prevent (ex: Google Chrome), running parallel scripts of V8 JavaScript, etc. A good experience result is chromium project (Google Chrome).
- Mentors:
Ion Lupascu
- Roadmap:
TBD
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Google Summer of Code [message #31398 is a reply to message #31397] |
Mon, 28 February 2011 18:25   |
|
|
| chickenk wrote on Mon, 28 February 2011 16:49 |
| tojocky wrote on Mon, 28 February 2011 15:00 | Another Idea:
- Name:
IPC(Inter-process Communication) using named pipes (local host) and socket (network)
- Proposed by:
Ion Lupascu
|
My 2 cents: We could even benefit from using the ZeroMQ framework here, that makes an awesome abstraction of IPC/sockets/whatever layers...
I dream of seeing ZeroMQ wrappers in U++. Some C++ bindings already exist.
Lionel
|
Thank you. I will analyze this. Is better to integrate a well supported project instead of individual project.
[Updated on: Mon, 28 February 2011 20:28] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Google Summer of Code [message #31424 is a reply to message #31397] |
Tue, 01 March 2011 17:20   |
|
|
| chickenk wrote on Mon, 28 February 2011 16:49 |
| tojocky wrote on Mon, 28 February 2011 15:00 | Another Idea:
- Name:
IPC(Inter-process Communication) using named pipes (local host) and socket (network)
- Proposed by:
Ion Lupascu
|
My 2 cents: We could even benefit from using the ZeroMQ framework here, that makes an awesome abstraction of IPC/sockets/whatever layers...
I dream of seeing ZeroMQ wrappers in U++. Some C++ bindings already exist.
Lionel
|
First stept of integration is ready!
Thank you for saving my time!
|
|
|
|
| Re: Google Summer of Code [message #31437 is a reply to message #31422] |
Wed, 02 March 2011 09:04   |
 |
koldo
Messages: 3458 Registered: August 2008
|
Senior Veteran |
|
|
| koldo wrote on Tue, 01 March 2011 15:39 | Well, we are (almost) officially candidates for GSoC 2011.
This year there are two new questions:
- If you are a small or new organization applying to GSoC, please list a larger, established GSoC organization or a Googler that can vouch for you here.
- If you are a large organization who is vouching for a small organization applying to GSoC for their first time this year, please list their name and why you think they'd be good candidates for GSoC here:
If you know an organization that could vouch us please try your best . The deadline is March 11, 2011 at 23:00 UTC.
|
Google people said this in discussion groups:
Google puts a lot of trust into the organizations that are taking part in GSoC. The idea behind this "voucher" is that if you're a new and lesser known organizaton, that you try and find an established org that can vouch for you so that Google extends the trust they put into them onto your org.
You can still apply without it, but if you're really small, new, and unknown, having some other org vouch for you would probably increase your chances.
Best regards
Iñaki
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Google Summer of Code [message #31686 is a reply to message #31677] |
Sat, 19 March 2011 23:07  |
|
|
| koldo wrote on Sat, 19 March 2011 18:50 | Oh yes, it is official.
Thank you for your effort.
|
Thank you Koldo for your great efforts!
I thing that we can continue without GSOC. Every of us have our little projects for existence. if we improve our code and make it better, than in a short time we can achieve more success.
Together we can do more!
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Apr 27 19:27:17 GMT+2 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02373 seconds
|