U++ framework: U++ SQL » [SQLITE] New version (3.7.0) introduces write-ahead logging.

Home » U++ Library support » U++ SQL » [SQLITE] New version (3.7.0) introduces write-ahead logging.

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

[SQLITE] New version (3.7.0) introduces write-ahead logging. [message #27610]

Sun, 25 July 2010 20:47

Novo
Messages: 1433
Registered: December 2006

Ultimate Contributor

It means that writes won't block reads any more. This feature makes SQLITE much more attractive as a database engine.

IMHO, SQLITE should be updated to a 3.7.x in UPP.

Regards,
Novo

Report message to a moderator

Re: [SQLITE] New version (3.7.0) introduces write-ahead logging. [message #27614 is a reply to message #27610]

Mon, 26 July 2010 08:41

koldo
Messages: 3461
Registered: August 2008

Senior Veteran

Interesting. Read this: http://www.sqlite.org/draft/wal.html

Best regards
Iñaki

[Updated on: Mon, 26 July 2010 08:45]

Report message to a moderator

Re: [SQLITE] New version (3.7.0) introduces write-ahead logging. [message #27626 is a reply to message #27614]

Mon, 26 July 2010 18:31

Novo
Messages: 1433
Registered: December 2006

Ultimate Contributor

Documentation:

http://www.sqlite.org/wal.html

Regards,
Novo

Report message to a moderator

Re: [SQLITE] New version (3.7.0) introduces write-ahead logging. [message #33395 is a reply to message #27610]

Sun, 31 July 2011 20:28

Novo
Messages: 1433
Registered: December 2006

Ultimate Contributor

It's been a long time since Sqlite got write-ahead logging. It has version 3.7.7.1 now.

IMHO, it should be safe to update.

Regards,
Novo

Report message to a moderator

Re: [SQLITE] New version (3.7.0) introduces write-ahead logging. [message #33403 is a reply to message #33395]

Mon, 01 August 2011 09:15

mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

Sorry. Now updated.

Report message to a moderator

Re: [SQLITE] New version (3.7.0) introduces write-ahead logging. [message #33412 is a reply to message #33403]

Tue, 02 August 2011 06:02

Novo
Messages: 1433
Registered: December 2006

Ultimate Contributor

mirek wrote on Mon, 01 August 2011 03:15

Sorry. Now updated.

Thanks!

Regards,
Novo

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Timestamp accuracy in postgres and upp
Next Topic:	SqlArray and default value of some field

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Sep 06 17:08:01 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00716 seconds