U++ framework: U++ Core » random functions proposal

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » random functions proposal

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: random functions proposal [message #35147 is a reply to message #35146]

Tue, 17 January 2012 11:13

mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

ratah wrote on Tue, 17 January 2012 03:56

Thank you for your reply,

Dolik.rce, I aggree with you for the use of cos and dword conversion. The idea of scaling is because I do not know it is possible to pass a parameter to Random(). So I could not limit the max value I get with Random().

Dolik.rce, Sender Ghost, all of your solutions are OK.
Why not to introduce that usefull function into Core?

Best regards,

Ratah

I think that with Random(n), it is really not much useful to add second parameter.

BTW, what IS actually missing is double Randomf(); (returning 0 < x < 1) - but with all bells and whistles... which might be a little bit harder than it seems to be done correctly.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		random functions proposal By: ratah on Mon, 16 January 2012 17:06
		Re: random functions proposal By: dolik.rce on Mon, 16 January 2012 17:58
		Re: random functions proposal By: Sender Ghost on Mon, 16 January 2012 18:31
		Re: random functions proposal By: ratah on Tue, 17 January 2012 09:56
		Re: random functions proposal By: mirek on Tue, 17 January 2012 11:13
		Re: random functions proposal By: Sender Ghost on Tue, 17 January 2012 12:58
		Re: random functions proposal By: koldo on Tue, 17 January 2012 13:10
		Re: random functions proposal By: mirek on Tue, 17 January 2012 13:59
		Re: random functions proposal By: mirek on Tue, 17 January 2012 14:24
		Re: random functions proposal By: dolik.rce on Tue, 17 January 2012 18:45
		Re: random functions proposal By: Sender Ghost on Tue, 17 January 2012 20:08
		Re: random functions proposal By: dolik.rce on Tue, 17 January 2012 20:25
		Re: random functions proposal By: Sender Ghost on Tue, 17 January 2012 20:37
		Re: random functions proposal By: cbpporter on Wed, 18 January 2012 15:44
		Re: random functions proposal By: dolik.rce on Wed, 18 January 2012 17:45
		Re: random functions proposal By: mirek on Wed, 18 January 2012 19:24

Previous Topic:	Init a ctrl inside INITBLOCK
Next Topic:	problem with new and delete

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Aug 05 07:39:28 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00717 seconds