U++ framework: Newbie corner » Skylark and HTTPS

Home » Community » Newbie corner » Skylark and HTTPS

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Skylark and HTTPS [message #40235 is a reply to message #40229]

Tue, 09 July 2013 08:24

dolik.rce
Messages: 1796
Registered: August 2008
Location: Czech Republic

Ultimate Contributor

andreincx wrote on Sun, 07 July 2013 16:42

Hello,

How would be possible to use Skylark over HTTPS? AFAIK there is no direct support in Skylark, should i use Apache or Nginx to get there (as proxy)? Would that imply some speed penalty, excepting that using https imply that?
Also another problem i'm facing with Skylark: one request take 3 to 10 ms to complete and the next one take 300ms. Do you know why this behavior?

Thanks,
Andrei

Hi Andrei,

I've been using nginx as a proxy for HTTP and didn't notice any speed penalty. Actually, when you use some advanced features of nginx (serving static files, compression, caching...) you can even get great speed improvements.

Regarding the other problem, it's hard to say without seeing the code. Did you configured enough workers (threads/prefork)?

Best regards,
Honza

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Skylark and HTTPS By: Anonymous on Sun, 07 July 2013 16:42
		Re: Skylark and HTTPS By: dolik.rce on Tue, 09 July 2013 08:24
		Re: Skylark and HTTPS By: Anonymous on Tue, 09 July 2013 08:29
		Re: Skylark and HTTPS By: Anonymous on Tue, 09 July 2013 08:31
		Re: Skylark and HTTPS By: dolik.rce on Wed, 10 July 2013 18:59
		Re: Skylark and HTTPS By: Anonymous on Thu, 11 July 2013 19:46
		Re: Skylark and HTTPS By: dolik.rce on Fri, 12 July 2013 09:47

Previous Topic:	[Solved] SysInfo_Demo_Gui is where to find?
Next Topic:	QTFStr

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Jun 30 16:51:46 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00875 seconds